Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance

Properties of conventional playing surfaces have been investigated for many years and the stiffness of the surface has potential to influence athletic performance. However, despite the proliferation of different infilled artificial turfs with varying properties, the effect of surface stiffness of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Wannop, Shaylyn Kowalchuk, Michael Esposito, Darren Stefanyshyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/10/12/340
id doaj-2af94bea4e8c4855bfd7ae28b5dae165
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2af94bea4e8c4855bfd7ae28b5dae1652020-12-11T00:02:56ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292020-12-011034034010.3390/life10120340Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete PerformanceJohn Wannop0Shaylyn Kowalchuk1Michael Esposito2Darren Stefanyshyn3Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaHuman Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaHuman Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaHuman Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaProperties of conventional playing surfaces have been investigated for many years and the stiffness of the surface has potential to influence athletic performance. However, despite the proliferation of different infilled artificial turfs with varying properties, the effect of surface stiffness of these types of surfaces on athlete performance remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to determine the influence of surface stiffness of artificial turf systems on athlete performance. Seventeen male athletes performed four movements (running, 5-10-5 agility, vertical jumping and sprinting) on five surfaces of varying stiffness: Softest (−50%), Softer (−34%), Soft (−16%), Control, Stiff (+17%). Performance metrics (running economy, jump height, sprint/agility time) and kinematic data were recorded during each movement and participants performed a subjective evaluation of the surface. When compared to the Control surface, performance was significantly improved during running (Softer, Soft), the agility drill (Softest) and vertical jumping (Soft). Subjectively, participants could not discern between any of the softer surfaces in terms of surface cushioning, however, the stiffer surface was rated as harder and less comfortable. Overall, changes in surface stiffness altered athletic performance and, to a lesser extent, subjective assessments of performance, with changes in performance being surface and movement specific.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/10/12/340artificial turfperformancesport biomechanics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Wannop
Shaylyn Kowalchuk
Michael Esposito
Darren Stefanyshyn
spellingShingle John Wannop
Shaylyn Kowalchuk
Michael Esposito
Darren Stefanyshyn
Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
Life
artificial turf
performance
sport biomechanics
author_facet John Wannop
Shaylyn Kowalchuk
Michael Esposito
Darren Stefanyshyn
author_sort John Wannop
title Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
title_short Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
title_full Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
title_fullStr Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Artificial Turf Surface Stiffness on Athlete Performance
title_sort influence of artificial turf surface stiffness on athlete performance
publisher MDPI AG
series Life
issn 2075-1729
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Properties of conventional playing surfaces have been investigated for many years and the stiffness of the surface has potential to influence athletic performance. However, despite the proliferation of different infilled artificial turfs with varying properties, the effect of surface stiffness of these types of surfaces on athlete performance remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to determine the influence of surface stiffness of artificial turf systems on athlete performance. Seventeen male athletes performed four movements (running, 5-10-5 agility, vertical jumping and sprinting) on five surfaces of varying stiffness: Softest (−50%), Softer (−34%), Soft (−16%), Control, Stiff (+17%). Performance metrics (running economy, jump height, sprint/agility time) and kinematic data were recorded during each movement and participants performed a subjective evaluation of the surface. When compared to the Control surface, performance was significantly improved during running (Softer, Soft), the agility drill (Softest) and vertical jumping (Soft). Subjectively, participants could not discern between any of the softer surfaces in terms of surface cushioning, however, the stiffer surface was rated as harder and less comfortable. Overall, changes in surface stiffness altered athletic performance and, to a lesser extent, subjective assessments of performance, with changes in performance being surface and movement specific.
topic artificial turf
performance
sport biomechanics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/10/12/340
work_keys_str_mv AT johnwannop influenceofartificialturfsurfacestiffnessonathleteperformance
AT shaylynkowalchuk influenceofartificialturfsurfacestiffnessonathleteperformance
AT michaelesposito influenceofartificialturfsurfacestiffnessonathleteperformance
AT darrenstefanyshyn influenceofartificialturfsurfacestiffnessonathleteperformance
_version_ 1724387107069231104