Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of tur...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-2af83ab3ba934789a866caf9ed6eeb77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2af83ab3ba934789a866caf9ed6eeb772020-11-24T22:32:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-03-01183659367610.5194/acp-18-3659-2018Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagramsM. Pinsky0A. Khain1Department of Atmospheric Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IsraelEvolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume.<br><br>The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Pinsky A. Khain |
spellingShingle |
M. Pinsky A. Khain Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
M. Pinsky A. Khain |
author_sort |
M. Pinsky |
title |
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams |
title_short |
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams |
title_full |
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams |
title_fullStr |
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams |
title_full_unstemmed |
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams |
title_sort |
theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – part iv: dsd evolution and mixing diagrams |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and
dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and
for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using
a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of
turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time
evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and
mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final
mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams
for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with
an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean
volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized
droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized
droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant
dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume.<br><br>The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot
serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type. |
url |
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mpinsky theoreticalanalysisofmixinginliquidcloudspartivdsdevolutionandmixingdiagrams AT akhain theoreticalanalysisofmixinginliquidcloudspartivdsdevolutionandmixingdiagrams |
_version_ |
1725734756360912896 |