Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams

Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of tur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Pinsky, A. Khain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf
id doaj-2af83ab3ba934789a866caf9ed6eeb77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2af83ab3ba934789a866caf9ed6eeb772020-11-24T22:32:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-03-01183659367610.5194/acp-18-3659-2018Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagramsM. Pinsky0A. Khain1Department of Atmospheric Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IsraelEvolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume.<br><br>The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Pinsky
A. Khain
spellingShingle M. Pinsky
A. Khain
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet M. Pinsky
A. Khain
author_sort M. Pinsky
title Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
title_short Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
title_full Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
title_fullStr Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
title_sort theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – part iv: dsd evolution and mixing diagrams
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion–evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume.<br><br>The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type.
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/3659/2018/acp-18-3659-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mpinsky theoreticalanalysisofmixinginliquidcloudspartivdsdevolutionandmixingdiagrams
AT akhain theoreticalanalysisofmixinginliquidcloudspartivdsdevolutionandmixingdiagrams
_version_ 1725734756360912896