Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2020-07-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/9-707/v1 |
id |
doaj-2aeb9b72d5f340bd871b2230320a8c9c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2aeb9b72d5f340bd871b2230320a8c9c2020-11-25T03:58:14ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-07-01910.12688/f1000research.24934.127509Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Rena M. Conti0Frank S. David1Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USAPharmagellan LLC, Milton, MA, 02186, USAIn the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them.https://f1000research.com/articles/9-707/v1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rena M. Conti Frank S. David |
spellingShingle |
Rena M. Conti Frank S. David Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research |
author_facet |
Rena M. Conti Frank S. David |
author_sort |
Rena M. Conti |
title |
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_short |
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full |
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_fullStr |
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do Americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_sort |
public research funding and pharmaceutical prices: do americans pay twice for drugs? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] |
publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
series |
F1000Research |
issn |
2046-1402 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them. |
url |
https://f1000research.com/articles/9-707/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT renamconti publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugsversion1peerreview2approved AT franksdavid publicresearchfundingandpharmaceuticalpricesdoamericanspaytwicefordrugsversion1peerreview2approved |
_version_ |
1724458452975091712 |