Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles

Abstract Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein, Thomas Kuhl, Ryszard Laskowski, Kyriaki Machera, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Michael Stemmer, Ingvar Sundh, Ivana Teodorovic, Aaldrik Tiktak, Chris J Topping, Gerrit Wolterink, Annette Aldrich, Cecilia Berg, Manuel Ortiz‐Santaliestra, Scott Weir, Franz Streissl, Robert H Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-02-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125
id doaj-2ada31767b544f8c89fe9eab534e2155
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ada31767b544f8c89fe9eab534e21552021-05-02T08:00:33ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322018-02-01162n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptilesEFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)Colin OcklefordPaulien AdriaansePhilippe BernyTheodorus BrockSabine DuquesneSandro GrilliAntonio F Hernandez‐JerezSusanne Hougaard BennekouMichael KleinThomas KuhlRyszard LaskowskiKyriaki MacheraOlavi PelkonenSilvia PieperMichael StemmerIngvar SundhIvana TeodorovicAaldrik TiktakChris J ToppingGerrit WolterinkAnnette AldrichCecilia BergManuel Ortiz‐SantaliestraScott WeirFranz StreisslRobert H SmithAbstract Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and reptiles by current risk assessments for other vertebrate groups was investigated. Available test methods and exposure models were reviewed with regard to their applicability to amphibians and reptiles. Proposals were made for specific protection goals aiming to protect important ecosystem services and taking into consideration the regulatory framework and existing protection goals for other vertebrates. Uncertainties, knowledge gaps and research needs were highlighted.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125amphibiansreptilesrisk assessmentpesticidesprotection goalseffects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
Colin Ockleford
Paulien Adriaanse
Philippe Berny
Theodorus Brock
Sabine Duquesne
Sandro Grilli
Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Michael Klein
Thomas Kuhl
Ryszard Laskowski
Kyriaki Machera
Olavi Pelkonen
Silvia Pieper
Michael Stemmer
Ingvar Sundh
Ivana Teodorovic
Aaldrik Tiktak
Chris J Topping
Gerrit Wolterink
Annette Aldrich
Cecilia Berg
Manuel Ortiz‐Santaliestra
Scott Weir
Franz Streissl
Robert H Smith
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
Colin Ockleford
Paulien Adriaanse
Philippe Berny
Theodorus Brock
Sabine Duquesne
Sandro Grilli
Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Michael Klein
Thomas Kuhl
Ryszard Laskowski
Kyriaki Machera
Olavi Pelkonen
Silvia Pieper
Michael Stemmer
Ingvar Sundh
Ivana Teodorovic
Aaldrik Tiktak
Chris J Topping
Gerrit Wolterink
Annette Aldrich
Cecilia Berg
Manuel Ortiz‐Santaliestra
Scott Weir
Franz Streissl
Robert H Smith
Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
EFSA Journal
amphibians
reptiles
risk assessment
pesticides
protection goals
effects
author_facet EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
Colin Ockleford
Paulien Adriaanse
Philippe Berny
Theodorus Brock
Sabine Duquesne
Sandro Grilli
Antonio F Hernandez‐Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Michael Klein
Thomas Kuhl
Ryszard Laskowski
Kyriaki Machera
Olavi Pelkonen
Silvia Pieper
Michael Stemmer
Ingvar Sundh
Ivana Teodorovic
Aaldrik Tiktak
Chris J Topping
Gerrit Wolterink
Annette Aldrich
Cecilia Berg
Manuel Ortiz‐Santaliestra
Scott Weir
Franz Streissl
Robert H Smith
author_sort EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
title Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
title_short Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
title_full Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
title_sort scientific opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Abstract Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and reptiles by current risk assessments for other vertebrate groups was investigated. Available test methods and exposure models were reviewed with regard to their applicability to amphibians and reptiles. Proposals were made for specific protection goals aiming to protect important ecosystem services and taking into consideration the regulatory framework and existing protection goals for other vertebrates. Uncertainties, knowledge gaps and research needs were highlighted.
topic amphibians
reptiles
risk assessment
pesticides
protection goals
effects
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonplantprotectionproductsandtheirresiduesppr scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT colinockleford scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT paulienadriaanse scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT philippeberny scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT theodorusbrock scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT sabineduquesne scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT sandrogrilli scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT antoniofhernandezjerez scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT susannehougaardbennekou scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT michaelklein scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT thomaskuhl scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT ryszardlaskowski scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT kyriakimachera scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT olavipelkonen scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT silviapieper scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT michaelstemmer scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT ingvarsundh scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT ivanateodorovic scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT aaldriktiktak scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT chrisjtopping scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT gerritwolterink scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT annettealdrich scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT ceciliaberg scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT manuelortizsantaliestra scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT scottweir scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT franzstreissl scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
AT roberthsmith scientificopiniononthestateofthescienceonpesticideriskassessmentforamphibiansandreptiles
_version_ 1721493827132325888