Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Effective chemoprevention strategies exist for women at high risk for breast cancer, yet uptake is low. Physician recommendation is an important determinant of uptake, but little is known about clinicians' attitudes to chemoprev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keogh Louise A, Hopper John L, Rosenthal Doreen, Phillips Kelly-Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
Online Access:http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/7/1/9
id doaj-2aa2b7dff4c940aea8ca1eaf4539973d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2aa2b7dff4c940aea8ca1eaf4539973d2020-11-25T01:00:52ZengBMCHereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice1897-42872009-05-0171910.1186/1897-4287-7-9Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancerKeogh Louise AHopper John LRosenthal DoreenPhillips Kelly-Anne<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Effective chemoprevention strategies exist for women at high risk for breast cancer, yet uptake is low. Physician recommendation is an important determinant of uptake, but little is known about clinicians' attitudes to chemoprevention.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Focus groups were conducted with clinicians at five Family Cancer Centers in three Australian states. Discussions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty three clinicians, including genetic counselors, clinical geneticists, medical oncologists, breast surgeons and gynaecologic oncologists, participated in six focus groups in 2007. The identified barriers to the discussion of the use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for chemoprevention pertained to issues of evidence (evidence for efficacy not strong enough, side-effects outweigh benefits, oophorectomy superior for mutation carriers), practice (drugs not approved for chemoprevention by regulatory authorities and not government subsidized, chemoprevention not endorsed in national guidelines and not many women ask about it), and perception (clinicians not knowledgeable about chemoprevention and women thought to be opposed to hormonal treatments).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The study demonstrated limited enthusiasm for discussing breast cancer chemoprevention as a management option for women at high familial risk. Several options for increasing the likelihood of clinicians discussing chemoprevention were identified; maintaining up to date national guidelines on management of these women and education of clinicians about the drugs themselves, the legality of "off-label" prescribing, and the actual costs of chemopreventive medications.</p> http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/7/1/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keogh Louise A
Hopper John L
Rosenthal Doreen
Phillips Kelly-Anne
spellingShingle Keogh Louise A
Hopper John L
Rosenthal Doreen
Phillips Kelly-Anne
Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
author_facet Keogh Louise A
Hopper John L
Rosenthal Doreen
Phillips Kelly-Anne
author_sort Keogh Louise A
title Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
title_short Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
title_full Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
title_fullStr Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
title_sort australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer
publisher BMC
series Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
issn 1897-4287
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Effective chemoprevention strategies exist for women at high risk for breast cancer, yet uptake is low. Physician recommendation is an important determinant of uptake, but little is known about clinicians' attitudes to chemoprevention.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Focus groups were conducted with clinicians at five Family Cancer Centers in three Australian states. Discussions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty three clinicians, including genetic counselors, clinical geneticists, medical oncologists, breast surgeons and gynaecologic oncologists, participated in six focus groups in 2007. The identified barriers to the discussion of the use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for chemoprevention pertained to issues of evidence (evidence for efficacy not strong enough, side-effects outweigh benefits, oophorectomy superior for mutation carriers), practice (drugs not approved for chemoprevention by regulatory authorities and not government subsidized, chemoprevention not endorsed in national guidelines and not many women ask about it), and perception (clinicians not knowledgeable about chemoprevention and women thought to be opposed to hormonal treatments).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The study demonstrated limited enthusiasm for discussing breast cancer chemoprevention as a management option for women at high familial risk. Several options for increasing the likelihood of clinicians discussing chemoprevention were identified; maintaining up to date national guidelines on management of these women and education of clinicians about the drugs themselves, the legality of "off-label" prescribing, and the actual costs of chemopreventive medications.</p>
url http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/7/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT keoghlouisea australiancliniciansandchemopreventionforwomenathighfamilialriskforbreastcancer
AT hopperjohnl australiancliniciansandchemopreventionforwomenathighfamilialriskforbreastcancer
AT rosenthaldoreen australiancliniciansandchemopreventionforwomenathighfamilialriskforbreastcancer
AT phillipskellyanne australiancliniciansandchemopreventionforwomenathighfamilialriskforbreastcancer
_version_ 1725212285625958400