Kinerja Struktur Rangka Beton Bertulang dengan Penambahan Dinding Pengisi Berlubang sebagai Perkuatan Seismik

This research was conducted to develop a model of seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame using infill wall with central openings, with and without lintels around the opening, by comparing the behaviour and performance of the frame structures with varying opening ratios. Prior to model t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida Ayu Made Budiwati, Made Sukrawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Teknologi Bandung 2017-04-01
Series:Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jts/article/view/4501/2471
Description
Summary:This research was conducted to develop a model of seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame using infill wall with central openings, with and without lintels around the opening, by comparing the behaviour and performance of the frame structures with varying opening ratios. Prior to model the strengthened frames, validation was done by comparing the behaviour of computer models using shell element (RDPsh) and diagonal strut (RDPst) to those of laboratory tests conducted by others. The validation models show that the lateral load-displacement diagrams of RDPsh fit the test result better than the strut ones. It was also found that the strut width equation for opening without lintel can not be used for opening with lintels as the lintels stiffen the frame and strengthen the wall around the openings. Based on these results, the width of strut was modified to match the response of model using shell element with lintels around the opening. The RC frames of 3, 4, and 5 storey retrofitted using infill wall with central opening ratio varies from 0 to 100%, was then conducted by modeling the infill wall as an equivalent diagonal strut and shell elements in SAP2000 software. The analysis results of 3-storey frames show that, reduction on lateral drifts of 65%, 58%, 43%, 22%, and 5% was observed for opening ratio of 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, dan 80%, respectively. Similar results were also found for the 4 and 5 storey frames. From the reinforcement requirements it can be concluded that the strengthening method can be applied with limitation on the wall opening ratios. For 3- storey frames, the addition of infill wall with opening ratio up to 60% is adequate to withstand the quake load specified in the SNI 1726:2012. For 4 and 5-storey frames however, opening ratio of 40% or less is required. Interestingly, the addition of infill wall with lintels can withstand higher base shear forces. However, the increased strength is followed by a decreased ductility in line with decreasing opening ratio.
ISSN:0853-2982
2549-2659