The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.

The black sheep effect (BSE) describes the evaluative upgrading of norm-compliant group members (ingroup bias), and evaluative downgrading of deviant (norm-violating) group members, relative to similar outgroup members. While the BSE has been demonstrated extensively in human groups, it has yet to b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Steain, Christopher John Stanton, Catherine J Stevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222975
id doaj-2a98163f85874edfb62c10e57cb9f7d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a98163f85874edfb62c10e57cb9f7d82021-03-03T21:11:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022297510.1371/journal.pone.0222975The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.Andrew SteainChristopher John StantonCatherine J StevensThe black sheep effect (BSE) describes the evaluative upgrading of norm-compliant group members (ingroup bias), and evaluative downgrading of deviant (norm-violating) group members, relative to similar outgroup members. While the BSE has been demonstrated extensively in human groups, it has yet to be shown in groups containing robots. This study investigated whether a BSE towards a 'deviant' robot (one low on warmth and competence) could be demonstrated. Participants performed a visual tracking task in a team with two humanoid NAO robots, with one robot being an ingroup member and the other an outgroup member. The robots offered advice to the participants which could be accepted or rejected, proving a measure of trust. Both robots were also evaluated using questionnaires, proxemics, and forced preference choices. Experiment 1 (N = 18) manipulated robot grouping to test our group manipulation generated ingroup bias (a necessary precursor to the BSE) which was supported. Experiment 2 (N = 72) manipulated the grouping, warmth and competence of both robots, predicting a BSE towards deviant ingroup robots, which was supported. Results indicated that a disagreeable ingroup robot is viewed less favourably than a disagreeable outgroup robot. Furthermore, when interacting with two independent robots, a "majority rule" effect can occur in which each robot's opinion is treated as independent vote, with participants significantly more likely to trust two unanimously disagreeing robots. No effect of warmth was found. The impact of these findings for human-robot team composition are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222975
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Steain
Christopher John Stanton
Catherine J Stevens
spellingShingle Andrew Steain
Christopher John Stanton
Catherine J Stevens
The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Andrew Steain
Christopher John Stanton
Catherine J Stevens
author_sort Andrew Steain
title The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
title_short The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
title_full The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
title_fullStr The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
title_full_unstemmed The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
title_sort black sheep effect: the case of the deviant ingroup robot.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The black sheep effect (BSE) describes the evaluative upgrading of norm-compliant group members (ingroup bias), and evaluative downgrading of deviant (norm-violating) group members, relative to similar outgroup members. While the BSE has been demonstrated extensively in human groups, it has yet to be shown in groups containing robots. This study investigated whether a BSE towards a 'deviant' robot (one low on warmth and competence) could be demonstrated. Participants performed a visual tracking task in a team with two humanoid NAO robots, with one robot being an ingroup member and the other an outgroup member. The robots offered advice to the participants which could be accepted or rejected, proving a measure of trust. Both robots were also evaluated using questionnaires, proxemics, and forced preference choices. Experiment 1 (N = 18) manipulated robot grouping to test our group manipulation generated ingroup bias (a necessary precursor to the BSE) which was supported. Experiment 2 (N = 72) manipulated the grouping, warmth and competence of both robots, predicting a BSE towards deviant ingroup robots, which was supported. Results indicated that a disagreeable ingroup robot is viewed less favourably than a disagreeable outgroup robot. Furthermore, when interacting with two independent robots, a "majority rule" effect can occur in which each robot's opinion is treated as independent vote, with participants significantly more likely to trust two unanimously disagreeing robots. No effect of warmth was found. The impact of these findings for human-robot team composition are discussed.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222975
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewsteain theblacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
AT christopherjohnstanton theblacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
AT catherinejstevens theblacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
AT andrewsteain blacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
AT christopherjohnstanton blacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
AT catherinejstevens blacksheepeffectthecaseofthedeviantingrouprobot
_version_ 1714818163084886016