Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans

Background and purpose: Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enrica Seravalli, Antonetta C. Houweling, Leo Van Battum, Thom A. Raaben, Marc Kuik, Jacco A. de Pooter, Marion P.R. Van Gellekom, Jochem Kaas, Wilfred de Vries, Erik A. Loeff, Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631617300799
id doaj-2a8e1d2a32074452a905c153c5375842
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a8e1d2a32074452a905c153c53758422020-11-25T00:16:52ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162018-01-0151925Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plansEnrica Seravalli0Antonetta C. Houweling1Leo Van Battum2Thom A. Raaben3Marc Kuik4Jacco A. de Pooter5Marion P.R. Van Gellekom6Jochem Kaas7Wilfred de Vries8Erik A. Loeff9Jeroen B. Van de Kamer10Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiotherapy, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The NetherlandsDepartment of R&D VSL, Delft, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Physics, Radiotherapiegroep, Arnhem, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Corresponding author.Background and purpose: Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. Methods: A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute’s treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. Results: For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. Conclusion: Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric. Keywords: Quality assurance, Dosimetry audit, IMRT, VMAT, QA deviceshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631617300799
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Enrica Seravalli
Antonetta C. Houweling
Leo Van Battum
Thom A. Raaben
Marc Kuik
Jacco A. de Pooter
Marion P.R. Van Gellekom
Jochem Kaas
Wilfred de Vries
Erik A. Loeff
Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
spellingShingle Enrica Seravalli
Antonetta C. Houweling
Leo Van Battum
Thom A. Raaben
Marc Kuik
Jacco A. de Pooter
Marion P.R. Van Gellekom
Jochem Kaas
Wilfred de Vries
Erik A. Loeff
Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Enrica Seravalli
Antonetta C. Houweling
Leo Van Battum
Thom A. Raaben
Marc Kuik
Jacco A. de Pooter
Marion P.R. Van Gellekom
Jochem Kaas
Wilfred de Vries
Erik A. Loeff
Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
author_sort Enrica Seravalli
title Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
title_short Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
title_full Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
title_fullStr Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
title_sort auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans
publisher Elsevier
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6316
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and purpose: Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. Methods: A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute’s treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. Results: For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. Conclusion: Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric. Keywords: Quality assurance, Dosimetry audit, IMRT, VMAT, QA devices
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631617300799
work_keys_str_mv AT enricaseravalli auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT antonettachouweling auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT leovanbattum auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT thomaraaben auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT marckuik auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT jaccoadepooter auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT marionprvangellekom auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT jochemkaas auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT wilfreddevries auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT erikaloeff auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
AT jeroenbvandekamer auditinglocalmethodsforqualityassuranceinradiotherapyusingthesamesetofpredefinedtreatmentplans
_version_ 1725382025393733632