Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose. We aimed to compare the learning curves of an ultrasound trainee (obstetrics and gynecology resident) and a radiology trainee when assessing pelvic endometriosis. Methods. Consecutive patients with suspected endometriosis were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center. They underwent an u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Indrielle-Kelly, D. Fischerova, P. Hanuš, F. Frühauf, M. Fanta, P. Dundr, D. Lavu, D. Cibula, A. Burgetova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8757281
id doaj-2a8ac99c7af64359a9eb27a6a5d4b267
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a8ac99c7af64359a9eb27a6a5d4b2672020-11-25T03:46:35ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412020-01-01202010.1155/2020/87572818757281Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance ImagingT. Indrielle-Kelly0D. Fischerova1P. Hanuš2F. Frühauf3M. Fanta4P. Dundr5D. Lavu6D. Cibula7A. Burgetova8First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Apolinářská 18, 128 08, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Apolinářská 18, 128 08, Czech RepublicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Apolinářská 18, 128 08, Czech RepublicDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 499, 128 08 Prague, Czech RepublicACALM Study Unit, Birmingham, UKDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Apolinářská 18, 128 08, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00 Prague, Czech RepublicPurpose. We aimed to compare the learning curves of an ultrasound trainee (obstetrics and gynecology resident) and a radiology trainee when assessing pelvic endometriosis. Methods. Consecutive patients with suspected endometriosis were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center. They underwent an ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, which was reported according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus. Trainees reported on deep endometriosis (DE), endometriomas, frozen pelvis, and adenomyosis. Using the Kappa agreement, their findings were compared against laparoscopy/histology and expert findings. The learning curve was considered positive when performance improved over time and indeterminate in all other cases. Results. Reports from thirty-five women were divided chronologically into 3 equal blocks to assess the learning curve. For ultrasound, trainee versus expert showed a positive learning curve in overall pelvic DE assessment. There was an excellent agreement for adenomyosis (Kappa=1.00, p=0.09), frozen pelvis (Kappa=0.90, p=0.01), bowel (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01), and bladder DE assessment (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). Endometrioma and uterosacral ligament assessment showed an indeterminate curve. For radiology, trainee versus expert showed a positive curve when detecting adenomyosis (Kappa=0.42, p=0.09) and bladder DE (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). The assessment of endometriomas, frozen pelvis, overall pelvic DE, bowel, and uterosacral ligament DE showed indeterminate curve. Agreement between trainees and laparoscopy/histology showed a positive curve for bladder (both) and frozen pelvis (ultrasound only). Conclusion. A positive learning curve can be seen in some areas of pelvic endometriosis mapping after as little as 35 cases, but a bigger caseload is required to demonstrate the curve in full. The ultrasound trainee had positive learning curves in more anatomical locations (bladder, adenomyosis, overall bowel DE, frozen pelvis) than the radiology trainee (bladder, adenomyosis), which could be down to individual factors, differences in training, or the imaging method itself.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8757281
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Indrielle-Kelly
D. Fischerova
P. Hanuš
F. Frühauf
M. Fanta
P. Dundr
D. Lavu
D. Cibula
A. Burgetova
spellingShingle T. Indrielle-Kelly
D. Fischerova
P. Hanuš
F. Frühauf
M. Fanta
P. Dundr
D. Lavu
D. Cibula
A. Burgetova
Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
BioMed Research International
author_facet T. Indrielle-Kelly
D. Fischerova
P. Hanuš
F. Frühauf
M. Fanta
P. Dundr
D. Lavu
D. Cibula
A. Burgetova
author_sort T. Indrielle-Kelly
title Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort early learning curve in the assessment of deep pelvic endometriosis for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose. We aimed to compare the learning curves of an ultrasound trainee (obstetrics and gynecology resident) and a radiology trainee when assessing pelvic endometriosis. Methods. Consecutive patients with suspected endometriosis were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center. They underwent an ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, which was reported according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus. Trainees reported on deep endometriosis (DE), endometriomas, frozen pelvis, and adenomyosis. Using the Kappa agreement, their findings were compared against laparoscopy/histology and expert findings. The learning curve was considered positive when performance improved over time and indeterminate in all other cases. Results. Reports from thirty-five women were divided chronologically into 3 equal blocks to assess the learning curve. For ultrasound, trainee versus expert showed a positive learning curve in overall pelvic DE assessment. There was an excellent agreement for adenomyosis (Kappa=1.00, p=0.09), frozen pelvis (Kappa=0.90, p=0.01), bowel (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01), and bladder DE assessment (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). Endometrioma and uterosacral ligament assessment showed an indeterminate curve. For radiology, trainee versus expert showed a positive curve when detecting adenomyosis (Kappa=0.42, p=0.09) and bladder DE (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). The assessment of endometriomas, frozen pelvis, overall pelvic DE, bowel, and uterosacral ligament DE showed indeterminate curve. Agreement between trainees and laparoscopy/histology showed a positive curve for bladder (both) and frozen pelvis (ultrasound only). Conclusion. A positive learning curve can be seen in some areas of pelvic endometriosis mapping after as little as 35 cases, but a bigger caseload is required to demonstrate the curve in full. The ultrasound trainee had positive learning curves in more anatomical locations (bladder, adenomyosis, overall bowel DE, frozen pelvis) than the radiology trainee (bladder, adenomyosis), which could be down to individual factors, differences in training, or the imaging method itself.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8757281
work_keys_str_mv AT tindriellekelly earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dfischerova earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT phanus earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ffruhauf earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mfanta earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT pdundr earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dlavu earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dcibula earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT aburgetova earlylearningcurveintheassessmentofdeeppelvicendometriosisforultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimaging
_version_ 1715120305814372352