Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowermen...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nowy Sacz Business School National-Louis University
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf
|
id |
doaj-2a8800956259440e9ae5ac12b2511c0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a8800956259440e9ae5ac12b2511c0c2020-11-24T23:37:55ZengNowy Sacz Business School National-Louis UniversityJournal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation2299-73262013-01-01947310010.7341/2013944Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction OrientationChristian Hoops0Michael Bücker1 IPSOS Observer Technical University of Dortmund Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowerment and customer value management (Ramani and Kumar, 2008). This study shows that indeed a fifth dimension of interaction orientation exists and investigates the determinants, moderators and consequences of this construct. The first notable finding is that B2B companies exhibit a greater degree of interaction orientation than B2C firms. Ramani and Kumar hypothesized that in their study. We show that there are B2C industries such as financial services, whose companies also have a greater interaction orientation. This could be the reason why the authors could not prove their hypothesis. Furthermore, we examine the influence of strategic orientations on organizational performances and compare various orientations with each other. http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf adaptive sellingcook's distancecustomer-oriented sellingentrepreneurial orientationenvironmentfinancial servicesinteraction orientationlearning orientationmarket orientationorganizatinal cultureorganizatinal strategyorganizational structures |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christian Hoops Michael Bücker |
spellingShingle |
Christian Hoops Michael Bücker Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation adaptive selling cook's distance customer-oriented selling entrepreneurial orientation environment financial services interaction orientation learning orientation market orientation organizatinal culture organizatinal strategy organizational structures |
author_facet |
Christian Hoops Michael Bücker |
author_sort |
Christian Hoops |
title |
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation |
title_short |
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation |
title_full |
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation |
title_fullStr |
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation |
title_sort |
determinants, moderators and consequences of organizational interaction orientation |
publisher |
Nowy Sacz Business School National-Louis University |
series |
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation |
issn |
2299-7326 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowerment and customer value management (Ramani and Kumar, 2008). This study shows that indeed a fifth dimension of interaction orientation exists and investigates the determinants, moderators and consequences of this construct. The first notable finding is that B2B companies exhibit a greater degree of interaction orientation than B2C firms. Ramani and Kumar hypothesized that in their study. We show that there are B2C industries such as financial services, whose companies also have a greater interaction orientation. This could be the reason why the authors could not prove their hypothesis. Furthermore, we examine the influence of strategic orientations on organizational performances and compare various orientations with each other. |
topic |
adaptive selling cook's distance customer-oriented selling entrepreneurial orientation environment financial services interaction orientation learning orientation market orientation organizatinal culture organizatinal strategy organizational structures |
url |
http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christianhoops determinantsmoderatorsandconsequencesoforganizationalinteractionorientation AT michaelbucker determinantsmoderatorsandconsequencesoforganizationalinteractionorientation |
_version_ |
1725518415826780160 |