Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation

Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowermen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Hoops, Michael Bücker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nowy Sacz Business School National-Louis University 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access: http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf
id doaj-2a8800956259440e9ae5ac12b2511c0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a8800956259440e9ae5ac12b2511c0c2020-11-24T23:37:55ZengNowy Sacz Business School National-Louis UniversityJournal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation2299-73262013-01-01947310010.7341/2013944Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction OrientationChristian Hoops0Michael Bücker1 IPSOS Observer Technical University of Dortmund Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowerment and customer value management (Ramani and Kumar, 2008). This study shows that indeed a fifth dimension of interaction orientation exists and investigates the determinants, moderators and consequences of this construct. The first notable finding is that B2B companies exhibit a greater degree of interaction orientation than B2C firms. Ramani and Kumar hypothesized that in their study. We show that there are B2C industries such as financial services, whose companies also have a greater interaction orientation. This could be the reason why the authors could not prove their hypothesis. Furthermore, we examine the influence of strategic orientations on organizational performances and compare various orientations with each other. http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf adaptive sellingcook's distancecustomer-oriented sellingentrepreneurial orientationenvironmentfinancial servicesinteraction orientationlearning orientationmarket orientationorganizatinal cultureorganizatinal strategyorganizational structures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Hoops
Michael Bücker
spellingShingle Christian Hoops
Michael Bücker
Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation
adaptive selling
cook's distance
customer-oriented selling
entrepreneurial orientation
environment
financial services
interaction orientation
learning orientation
market orientation
organizatinal culture
organizatinal strategy
organizational structures
author_facet Christian Hoops
Michael Bücker
author_sort Christian Hoops
title Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
title_short Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
title_full Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
title_fullStr Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
title_full_unstemmed Determinants, Moderators and Consequences of Organizational Interaction Orientation
title_sort determinants, moderators and consequences of organizational interaction orientation
publisher Nowy Sacz Business School National-Louis University
series Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation
issn 2299-7326
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Interaction orientation reflects the ability of a company to interact with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions. Four dimensions of interaction orientation are identified in the literature: customer concept, interaction response capacity, customer empowerment and customer value management (Ramani and Kumar, 2008). This study shows that indeed a fifth dimension of interaction orientation exists and investigates the determinants, moderators and consequences of this construct. The first notable finding is that B2B companies exhibit a greater degree of interaction orientation than B2C firms. Ramani and Kumar hypothesized that in their study. We show that there are B2C industries such as financial services, whose companies also have a greater interaction orientation. This could be the reason why the authors could not prove their hypothesis. Furthermore, we examine the influence of strategic orientations on organizational performances and compare various orientations with each other.
topic adaptive selling
cook's distance
customer-oriented selling
entrepreneurial orientation
environment
financial services
interaction orientation
learning orientation
market orientation
organizatinal culture
organizatinal strategy
organizational structures
url http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue4/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_4_2013_Article_4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christianhoops determinantsmoderatorsandconsequencesoforganizationalinteractionorientation
AT michaelbucker determinantsmoderatorsandconsequencesoforganizationalinteractionorientation
_version_ 1725518415826780160