A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To validate the treatment-specific Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Item content was developed by 4 heterogeneous patient focus groups (n = 32). Instrument v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stewart Jeanette A, Fain Joel M, Stewart William C, Atkinson Mark J, Dhawan Ravinder, Mozaffari Essy, Lohs Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2003-11-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/67
id doaj-2a84a788bd754faa83d15ea47c890f12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a84a788bd754faa83d15ea47c890f122020-11-24T21:58:24ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252003-11-01116710.1186/1477-7525-1-67A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)Stewart Jeanette AFain Joel MStewart William CAtkinson Mark JDhawan RavinderMozaffari EssyLohs Jan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To validate the treatment-specific Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Item content was developed by 4 heterogeneous patient focus groups (n = 32). Instrument validation involved 250 patients on ocular hypotensive medications recruited from ophthalmology practices in the Southern USA. Participants responded to demographic and test questions during a clinic visit. Standard psychometric analyses were performed on the resulting data.</p> <p>Sample</p> <p>Of the 412 patients screened, 253 consented to participate, and 250 provided complete datasets. The sample included 44% male (n = 109), 44% Black (n = 109) and 57% brown eyed (n = 142) participants, with a mean age of 64.6 years (SD 13.1) and a history of elevated IOP for an average of 8.4 yrs (SD 7.8). A majority was receiving monotherapy (60%, n = 151).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A PC Factor analysis (w/ varimax rotation) of the 31 items yielded 5 factors (Eigenvalues > 1.0) explaining 70% of the total variance. Weaker and conceptually redundant items were removed and the remaining 15 items reanalyzed. The satisfaction factors were; Eye Irritation (EI; 4 items), Convenience of Use (CofU; 3 items), Ease of Use (EofU; 3 items), Hyperemia (HYP; 3 items), and Medication Effectiveness (EFF; 2 items). Chronbach's Alphas ranged from .80 to .86. Greater distributional skew was found for less common experiences (i.e., HYP & EI with 65% & 48.4% ceilings) than for more common experiences (i.e., EofU, CofU, EFF with 10.8%, 20.8% & 15.9% ceilings). TSS-IOP scales converged with conceptually related scales on a previously validated measure of treatment satisfaction, the TSQM (r = .36 to .77). Evidence of concurrent criterion-related validity was found. Patients' symptomatic ratings of eye irritation, hyperemia and difficulties using the medication correlated with satisfaction on these dimensions (r = .30-.56, all p < .001). Clinicians' ratings of IOP control, severity of side effects and problematic medication use correlated with patients' satisfaction scores on these dimensions (r = .13-.26, all p < .01).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study provides initial evidence that the TSS-IOP is a reliable and valid measure, assessing patients' satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications.</p> http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/67
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stewart Jeanette A
Fain Joel M
Stewart William C
Atkinson Mark J
Dhawan Ravinder
Mozaffari Essy
Lohs Jan
spellingShingle Stewart Jeanette A
Fain Joel M
Stewart William C
Atkinson Mark J
Dhawan Ravinder
Mozaffari Essy
Lohs Jan
A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Stewart Jeanette A
Fain Joel M
Stewart William C
Atkinson Mark J
Dhawan Ravinder
Mozaffari Essy
Lohs Jan
author_sort Stewart Jeanette A
title A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
title_short A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
title_full A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
title_fullStr A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
title_full_unstemmed A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
title_sort new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure (tss-iop)
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2003-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>To validate the treatment-specific Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Item content was developed by 4 heterogeneous patient focus groups (n = 32). Instrument validation involved 250 patients on ocular hypotensive medications recruited from ophthalmology practices in the Southern USA. Participants responded to demographic and test questions during a clinic visit. Standard psychometric analyses were performed on the resulting data.</p> <p>Sample</p> <p>Of the 412 patients screened, 253 consented to participate, and 250 provided complete datasets. The sample included 44% male (n = 109), 44% Black (n = 109) and 57% brown eyed (n = 142) participants, with a mean age of 64.6 years (SD 13.1) and a history of elevated IOP for an average of 8.4 yrs (SD 7.8). A majority was receiving monotherapy (60%, n = 151).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A PC Factor analysis (w/ varimax rotation) of the 31 items yielded 5 factors (Eigenvalues > 1.0) explaining 70% of the total variance. Weaker and conceptually redundant items were removed and the remaining 15 items reanalyzed. The satisfaction factors were; Eye Irritation (EI; 4 items), Convenience of Use (CofU; 3 items), Ease of Use (EofU; 3 items), Hyperemia (HYP; 3 items), and Medication Effectiveness (EFF; 2 items). Chronbach's Alphas ranged from .80 to .86. Greater distributional skew was found for less common experiences (i.e., HYP & EI with 65% & 48.4% ceilings) than for more common experiences (i.e., EofU, CofU, EFF with 10.8%, 20.8% & 15.9% ceilings). TSS-IOP scales converged with conceptually related scales on a previously validated measure of treatment satisfaction, the TSQM (r = .36 to .77). Evidence of concurrent criterion-related validity was found. Patients' symptomatic ratings of eye irritation, hyperemia and difficulties using the medication correlated with satisfaction on these dimensions (r = .30-.56, all p < .001). Clinicians' ratings of IOP control, severity of side effects and problematic medication use correlated with patients' satisfaction scores on these dimensions (r = .13-.26, all p < .01).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study provides initial evidence that the TSS-IOP is a reliable and valid measure, assessing patients' satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications.</p>
url http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/67
work_keys_str_mv AT stewartjeanettea anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT fainjoelm anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT stewartwilliamc anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT atkinsonmarkj anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT dhawanravinder anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT mozaffariessy anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT lohsjan anewmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT stewartjeanettea newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT fainjoelm newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT stewartwilliamc newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT atkinsonmarkj newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT dhawanravinder newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT mozaffariessy newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
AT lohsjan newmeasureofpatientsatisfactionwithocularhypotensivemedicationsthetreatmentsatisfactionsurveyforintraocularpressuretssiop
_version_ 1725852183505666048