Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans

The contribution of non-sensory information processing to perceptual decision making is not fully understood. Choice biases have been described for mice and humans and are highly prevalent even if they decrease rewarding outcomes. Choice biases are usually reduced by discriminability because stimulu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Treviño, Ricardo Medina-Coss y León, Belén Haro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00099/full
id doaj-2a718ed5b9f14901be574834d89cbf74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a718ed5b9f14901be574834d89cbf742020-11-25T03:48:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532020-07-011410.3389/fnbeh.2020.00099545318Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and HumansMario TreviñoRicardo Medina-Coss y LeónBelén HaroThe contribution of non-sensory information processing to perceptual decision making is not fully understood. Choice biases have been described for mice and humans and are highly prevalent even if they decrease rewarding outcomes. Choice biases are usually reduced by discriminability because stimulus strength directly enables the adjustments in the decision strategies used by decision-makers. However, choice biases could also derive from functional asymmetries in sensory processing, decision making, or both. Here, we tested how particular experimental contingencies influenced the production of choice biases in mice and humans. Our main goal was to establish the tasks and methods to jointly characterize psychometric performance and innate side-choice behavior in mice and humans. We implemented forced and un-forced visual tasks and found that both species displayed stable levels of side-choice biases, forming continuous distributions from low to high levels of choice stereotypy. Interestingly, stimulus discriminability reduced the side-choice biases in forced-choice, but not in free-choice tasks. Choice biases were stable in appearance and intensity across experimental days and could be employed to identify mice and human participants. Additionally, side- and alternating choices could be reinforced for both mice and humans, implying that choice biases were adaptable to non-visual manipulations. Our results highlight the fact that internal and external elements can influence the production of choice biases. Adaptations of our tasks could become a helpful diagnostic tool to detect aberrant levels of choice variability.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00099/fullmousehumanchoice-biasdiscriminabilitytwo-alternative choice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario Treviño
Ricardo Medina-Coss y León
Belén Haro
spellingShingle Mario Treviño
Ricardo Medina-Coss y León
Belén Haro
Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
mouse
human
choice-bias
discriminability
two-alternative choice
author_facet Mario Treviño
Ricardo Medina-Coss y León
Belén Haro
author_sort Mario Treviño
title Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
title_short Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
title_full Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
title_fullStr Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive Choice Biases in Mice and Humans
title_sort adaptive choice biases in mice and humans
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The contribution of non-sensory information processing to perceptual decision making is not fully understood. Choice biases have been described for mice and humans and are highly prevalent even if they decrease rewarding outcomes. Choice biases are usually reduced by discriminability because stimulus strength directly enables the adjustments in the decision strategies used by decision-makers. However, choice biases could also derive from functional asymmetries in sensory processing, decision making, or both. Here, we tested how particular experimental contingencies influenced the production of choice biases in mice and humans. Our main goal was to establish the tasks and methods to jointly characterize psychometric performance and innate side-choice behavior in mice and humans. We implemented forced and un-forced visual tasks and found that both species displayed stable levels of side-choice biases, forming continuous distributions from low to high levels of choice stereotypy. Interestingly, stimulus discriminability reduced the side-choice biases in forced-choice, but not in free-choice tasks. Choice biases were stable in appearance and intensity across experimental days and could be employed to identify mice and human participants. Additionally, side- and alternating choices could be reinforced for both mice and humans, implying that choice biases were adaptable to non-visual manipulations. Our results highlight the fact that internal and external elements can influence the production of choice biases. Adaptations of our tasks could become a helpful diagnostic tool to detect aberrant levels of choice variability.
topic mouse
human
choice-bias
discriminability
two-alternative choice
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00099/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariotrevino adaptivechoicebiasesinmiceandhumans
AT ricardomedinacossyleon adaptivechoicebiasesinmiceandhumans
AT belenharo adaptivechoicebiasesinmiceandhumans
_version_ 1724497769649930240