Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy

Abstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsutomu Takeuchi, Roy Fleischmann, Noriko Iikuni, Harry Shi, Koshika Soma, Jerome Paulissen, Tomohiro Hirose, Josef S. Smolen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Arthritis Research & Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-y
id doaj-2a715546c26f484e96897f93b4735b94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a715546c26f484e96897f93b4735b942021-08-29T11:07:17ZengBMCArthritis Research & Therapy1478-63622021-08-0123111110.1186/s13075-021-02591-yDifferences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL StrategyTsutomu Takeuchi0Roy Fleischmann1Noriko Iikuni2Harry Shi3Koshika Soma4Jerome Paulissen5Tomohiro Hirose6Josef S. Smolen7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio UniversityRheumatology Division, Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer Japan IncDivision of Rheumatology and Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of ViennaAbstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumulative probability plots. Methods In the 12-month, phase IIIb/IV ORAL Strategy study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 5 mg BID + MTX, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, cumulative probability plots were generated for mean percent change from baseline (%∆) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; clinical response) and mean change from baseline (∆) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; functional response) at month 12. Median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels by time period were summarized by CDAI remission (≤ 2.8) status at months 6 and 12. Results Data for 1146 patients were analyzed. At month 12, cumulative probability plots for %∆CDAI and ∆HAQ-DI were similar across treatments in patients with greater response. At lower levels of response, patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy did not respond as well as those receiving combination therapies. With tofacitinib + MTX, numerically higher baseline CRP levels and numerically larger post-baseline CRP reductions were seen in patients achieving CDAI remission at months 6 and 12 vs those who did not. Conclusions These results suggest that patients with a greater response did well, irrespective of which therapy they received. Patients with lesser response had better outcomes with combination therapies vs tofacitinib monotherapy, suggesting they benefitted from MTX. High pre-treatment CRP levels may be associated with better response to tofacitinib + MTX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02187055. Registered on 08 July 2014.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-yAdalimumabMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritisTofacitinib
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tsutomu Takeuchi
Roy Fleischmann
Noriko Iikuni
Harry Shi
Koshika Soma
Jerome Paulissen
Tomohiro Hirose
Josef S. Smolen
spellingShingle Tsutomu Takeuchi
Roy Fleischmann
Noriko Iikuni
Harry Shi
Koshika Soma
Jerome Paulissen
Tomohiro Hirose
Josef S. Smolen
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Adalimumab
Methotrexate
Rheumatoid arthritis
Tofacitinib
author_facet Tsutomu Takeuchi
Roy Fleischmann
Noriko Iikuni
Harry Shi
Koshika Soma
Jerome Paulissen
Tomohiro Hirose
Josef S. Smolen
author_sort Tsutomu Takeuchi
title Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
title_short Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
title_full Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
title_fullStr Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
title_sort differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from oral strategy
publisher BMC
series Arthritis Research & Therapy
issn 1478-6362
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumulative probability plots. Methods In the 12-month, phase IIIb/IV ORAL Strategy study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 5 mg BID + MTX, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, cumulative probability plots were generated for mean percent change from baseline (%∆) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; clinical response) and mean change from baseline (∆) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; functional response) at month 12. Median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels by time period were summarized by CDAI remission (≤ 2.8) status at months 6 and 12. Results Data for 1146 patients were analyzed. At month 12, cumulative probability plots for %∆CDAI and ∆HAQ-DI were similar across treatments in patients with greater response. At lower levels of response, patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy did not respond as well as those receiving combination therapies. With tofacitinib + MTX, numerically higher baseline CRP levels and numerically larger post-baseline CRP reductions were seen in patients achieving CDAI remission at months 6 and 12 vs those who did not. Conclusions These results suggest that patients with a greater response did well, irrespective of which therapy they received. Patients with lesser response had better outcomes with combination therapies vs tofacitinib monotherapy, suggesting they benefitted from MTX. High pre-treatment CRP levels may be associated with better response to tofacitinib + MTX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02187055. Registered on 08 July 2014.
topic Adalimumab
Methotrexate
Rheumatoid arthritis
Tofacitinib
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tsutomutakeuchi differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT royfleischmann differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT norikoiikuni differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT harryshi differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT koshikasoma differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT jeromepaulissen differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT tomohirohirose differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
AT josefssmolen differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy
_version_ 1721187127064002560