Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy
Abstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumula...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Arthritis Research & Therapy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-y |
id |
doaj-2a715546c26f484e96897f93b4735b94 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a715546c26f484e96897f93b4735b942021-08-29T11:07:17ZengBMCArthritis Research & Therapy1478-63622021-08-0123111110.1186/s13075-021-02591-yDifferences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL StrategyTsutomu Takeuchi0Roy Fleischmann1Noriko Iikuni2Harry Shi3Koshika Soma4Jerome Paulissen5Tomohiro Hirose6Josef S. Smolen7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio UniversityRheumatology Division, Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer IncPfizer Japan IncDivision of Rheumatology and Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of ViennaAbstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumulative probability plots. Methods In the 12-month, phase IIIb/IV ORAL Strategy study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 5 mg BID + MTX, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, cumulative probability plots were generated for mean percent change from baseline (%∆) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; clinical response) and mean change from baseline (∆) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; functional response) at month 12. Median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels by time period were summarized by CDAI remission (≤ 2.8) status at months 6 and 12. Results Data for 1146 patients were analyzed. At month 12, cumulative probability plots for %∆CDAI and ∆HAQ-DI were similar across treatments in patients with greater response. At lower levels of response, patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy did not respond as well as those receiving combination therapies. With tofacitinib + MTX, numerically higher baseline CRP levels and numerically larger post-baseline CRP reductions were seen in patients achieving CDAI remission at months 6 and 12 vs those who did not. Conclusions These results suggest that patients with a greater response did well, irrespective of which therapy they received. Patients with lesser response had better outcomes with combination therapies vs tofacitinib monotherapy, suggesting they benefitted from MTX. High pre-treatment CRP levels may be associated with better response to tofacitinib + MTX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02187055. Registered on 08 July 2014.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-yAdalimumabMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritisTofacitinib |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tsutomu Takeuchi Roy Fleischmann Noriko Iikuni Harry Shi Koshika Soma Jerome Paulissen Tomohiro Hirose Josef S. Smolen |
spellingShingle |
Tsutomu Takeuchi Roy Fleischmann Noriko Iikuni Harry Shi Koshika Soma Jerome Paulissen Tomohiro Hirose Josef S. Smolen Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy Arthritis Research & Therapy Adalimumab Methotrexate Rheumatoid arthritis Tofacitinib |
author_facet |
Tsutomu Takeuchi Roy Fleischmann Noriko Iikuni Harry Shi Koshika Soma Jerome Paulissen Tomohiro Hirose Josef S. Smolen |
author_sort |
Tsutomu Takeuchi |
title |
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy |
title_short |
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy |
title_full |
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy |
title_fullStr |
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from ORAL Strategy |
title_sort |
differences and similarities in clinical and functional responses among patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib plus methotrexate, and adalimumab plus methotrexate: a post hoc analysis of data from oral strategy |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Arthritis Research & Therapy |
issn |
1478-6362 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background This post hoc analysis assessed clinical and functional responses to tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib + methotrexate (MTX), and adalimumab + MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ORAL Strategy study, including evaluation of patient-level data using cumulative probability plots. Methods In the 12-month, phase IIIb/IV ORAL Strategy study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 5 mg BID + MTX, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, cumulative probability plots were generated for mean percent change from baseline (%∆) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; clinical response) and mean change from baseline (∆) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; functional response) at month 12. Median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels by time period were summarized by CDAI remission (≤ 2.8) status at months 6 and 12. Results Data for 1146 patients were analyzed. At month 12, cumulative probability plots for %∆CDAI and ∆HAQ-DI were similar across treatments in patients with greater response. At lower levels of response, patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy did not respond as well as those receiving combination therapies. With tofacitinib + MTX, numerically higher baseline CRP levels and numerically larger post-baseline CRP reductions were seen in patients achieving CDAI remission at months 6 and 12 vs those who did not. Conclusions These results suggest that patients with a greater response did well, irrespective of which therapy they received. Patients with lesser response had better outcomes with combination therapies vs tofacitinib monotherapy, suggesting they benefitted from MTX. High pre-treatment CRP levels may be associated with better response to tofacitinib + MTX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02187055. Registered on 08 July 2014. |
topic |
Adalimumab Methotrexate Rheumatoid arthritis Tofacitinib |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02591-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tsutomutakeuchi differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT royfleischmann differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT norikoiikuni differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT harryshi differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT koshikasoma differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT jeromepaulissen differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT tomohirohirose differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy AT josefssmolen differencesandsimilaritiesinclinicalandfunctionalresponsesamongpatientsreceivingtofacitinibmonotherapytofacitinibplusmethotrexateandadalimumabplusmethotrexateaposthocanalysisofdatafromoralstrategy |
_version_ |
1721187127064002560 |