Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method

Background: The recent studies have shown that the rates of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders among workers in the construction industry are much higher than those working in other industries. The aim of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in construction wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keivan Saedpanah, Majid Motamedzade, Keivan Salimi, Tahereh Eskandari, Seyed Ehsan Samaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran 2018-01-01
Series:Archives of Occupational Health
Online Access:http://aoh.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-30-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-2a6e441066ac423ebce0133f853a2852
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a6e441066ac423ebce0133f853a28522020-11-24T23:52:32ZengShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, IranArchives of Occupational Health 2588-30702588-36902018-01-01215662Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) MethodKeivan Saedpanah0Majid Motamedzade1Keivan Salimi2Tahereh Eskandari3Seyed Ehsan Samaei4 1 Msc Student, of Occupational Health Engineering, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran Sciences, Hamadan, Iran Expert, Marivan Health Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Kurdistan, Iran Msc Student, of Occupational Health Engineering, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran PhD Student, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran Background: The recent studies have shown that the rates of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders among workers in the construction industry are much higher than those working in other industries. The aim of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in construction workshops using Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) method. Methods: A total of 150 workers were randomly selected from five construction workshops. They were working in the wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks. During the site visit of five workshops, tasks were observed using WERA assessment. A structured interview with self-report charts (Body Discomfort Chart) was administered to participants for each task. Results: An analysis of the self-report charts revealed that 94%, 92%, and 83% of workers reported discomfort in their backs in concreting, wall plastering, and bricklaying tasks, respectively. The shoulder region was the second highest reported uncomfortable region by 86% and 84% of workers in concreting and wall plastering tasks, respectively. The wrist region was the second highest reported uncomfortable region reported by 80% of workers in bricklaying task. From the WERA assessment for wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks, the final scores were 36.57 (SD=8.62), 39.66 (SD=6.92), and 40.06 (SD=7.75), respectively. The highest and lowest scores were 5.87 (SD=1.14) and 2.21 (SD=1.28), respectively for neck and vibration in wall plastering. Conclusion: The results showed that workers have pain in their back, shoulder, wrist, elbow, neck, and leg regions during their work in wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks. The final score for concreting task was higher than wall plastering and bricklaying tasks.http://aoh.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-30-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keivan Saedpanah
Majid Motamedzade
Keivan Salimi
Tahereh Eskandari
Seyed Ehsan Samaei
spellingShingle Keivan Saedpanah
Majid Motamedzade
Keivan Salimi
Tahereh Eskandari
Seyed Ehsan Samaei
Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
Archives of Occupational Health
author_facet Keivan Saedpanah
Majid Motamedzade
Keivan Salimi
Tahereh Eskandari
Seyed Ehsan Samaei
author_sort Keivan Saedpanah
title Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
title_short Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
title_full Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
title_fullStr Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
title_full_unstemmed Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method
title_sort physical risk factors among construction workers by workplace ergonomic risk assessment (wera) method
publisher Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran
series Archives of Occupational Health
issn 2588-3070
2588-3690
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: The recent studies have shown that the rates of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders among workers in the construction industry are much higher than those working in other industries. The aim of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in construction workshops using Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) method. Methods: A total of 150 workers were randomly selected from five construction workshops. They were working in the wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks. During the site visit of five workshops, tasks were observed using WERA assessment. A structured interview with self-report charts (Body Discomfort Chart) was administered to participants for each task. Results: An analysis of the self-report charts revealed that 94%, 92%, and 83% of workers reported discomfort in their backs in concreting, wall plastering, and bricklaying tasks, respectively. The shoulder region was the second highest reported uncomfortable region by 86% and 84% of workers in concreting and wall plastering tasks, respectively. The wrist region was the second highest reported uncomfortable region reported by 80% of workers in bricklaying task. From the WERA assessment for wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks, the final scores were 36.57 (SD=8.62), 39.66 (SD=6.92), and 40.06 (SD=7.75), respectively. The highest and lowest scores were 5.87 (SD=1.14) and 2.21 (SD=1.28), respectively for neck and vibration in wall plastering. Conclusion: The results showed that workers have pain in their back, shoulder, wrist, elbow, neck, and leg regions during their work in wall plastering, bricklaying, and concreting tasks. The final score for concreting task was higher than wall plastering and bricklaying tasks.
url http://aoh.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-30-5&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT keivansaedpanah physicalriskfactorsamongconstructionworkersbyworkplaceergonomicriskassessmentweramethod
AT majidmotamedzade physicalriskfactorsamongconstructionworkersbyworkplaceergonomicriskassessmentweramethod
AT keivansalimi physicalriskfactorsamongconstructionworkersbyworkplaceergonomicriskassessmentweramethod
AT tahereheskandari physicalriskfactorsamongconstructionworkersbyworkplaceergonomicriskassessmentweramethod
AT seyedehsansamaei physicalriskfactorsamongconstructionworkersbyworkplaceergonomicriskassessmentweramethod
_version_ 1725473240154898432