Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction
<p>The present article gives an account of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction (AR) and analyzes how they justify them. We used a qualitative methodology, collecting information using semi-structured interviews that wher...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
2017-11-01
|
Series: | methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/116 |
id |
doaj-2a575f918cfb45c1829065b14a47d9e5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a575f918cfb45c1829065b14a47d9e52020-11-25T03:03:16ZengUniversidad Rey Juan Carlosmethaodos.revista de ciencias sociales2340-84132340-84132017-11-015210.17502/m.rcs.v5i2.116116Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproductionYanko Pavicevic Cifuentes0Universidad Diego Portales<p>The present article gives an account of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction (AR) and analyzes how they justify them. We used a qualitative methodology, collecting information using semi-structured interviews that where conducted to 21 parliamentarians of the two main political coalitions present in Chile and analyzed with textual discourse analysis. In the parliamentarian’s discourse, there was consensus on the need to prioritize heterosexual couple’s access to AR and also on the requisite of having a legal frame for homosexual couples, before granting them access to reproductive medicine. The main argument used to reject or postpone the access of homosexual persons to AR was the wellbeing of the children conceived, that would be affected by a society that discriminates them.</p>https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/116familias homoparentalesgrupos sexuales minoritariosinvestigación cualitativapoder legislativoreproducción asistida |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yanko Pavicevic Cifuentes |
spellingShingle |
Yanko Pavicevic Cifuentes Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales familias homoparentales grupos sexuales minoritarios investigación cualitativa poder legislativo reproducción asistida |
author_facet |
Yanko Pavicevic Cifuentes |
author_sort |
Yanko Pavicevic Cifuentes |
title |
Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
title_short |
Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
title_full |
Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
title_sort |
analysis of the positions of chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction |
publisher |
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos |
series |
methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales |
issn |
2340-8413 2340-8413 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
<p>The present article gives an account of the positions of Chilean parliamentarians regarding the access of homosexual persons to assisted reproduction (AR) and analyzes how they justify them. We used a qualitative methodology, collecting information using semi-structured interviews that where conducted to 21 parliamentarians of the two main political coalitions present in Chile and analyzed with textual discourse analysis. In the parliamentarian’s discourse, there was consensus on the need to prioritize heterosexual couple’s access to AR and also on the requisite of having a legal frame for homosexual couples, before granting them access to reproductive medicine. The main argument used to reject or postpone the access of homosexual persons to AR was the wellbeing of the children conceived, that would be affected by a society that discriminates them.</p> |
topic |
familias homoparentales grupos sexuales minoritarios investigación cualitativa poder legislativo reproducción asistida |
url |
https://www.methaodos.org/revista-methaodos/index.php/methaodos/article/view/116 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yankopaviceviccifuentes analysisofthepositionsofchileanparliamentariansregardingtheaccessofhomosexualpersonstoassistedreproduction |
_version_ |
1724686655180242944 |