Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region

Few data assessing non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) intake are available, especially within rural, health-disparate populations, where obesity and related co-morbidities are prevalent. The objective of this study is to characterize NNS intake for this population and examine the variance in demographics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valisa E. Hedrick, Erin M. Passaro, Brenda M. Davy, Wen You, Jamie M. Zoellner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-07-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/7/757
id doaj-2a552e09096944338eefbf88f98ed4e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a552e09096944338eefbf88f98ed4e72020-11-24T22:04:12ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432017-07-019775710.3390/nu9070757nu9070757Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate RegionValisa E. Hedrick0Erin M. Passaro1Brenda M. Davy2Wen You3Jamie M. Zoellner4Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, 250 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Public Health Sciences, Cancer Center without Walls, University of Virginia, 16 East Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USAFew data assessing non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) intake are available, especially within rural, health-disparate populations, where obesity and related co-morbidities are prevalent. The objective of this study is to characterize NNS intake for this population and examine the variance in demographics, cardio-metabolic outcomes, and dietary intake between NNS consumers and non-consumers. A cross-sectional sample (n = 301) of Virginian adults from a randomized controlled trial (data collected from 2012 to 2014) targeting sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake completed three 24-h dietary recalls, and demographics and cardio-metabolic measures were assessed. The frequency, types, and sources of NNS consumption were identified. Thirty-three percent of participants reported consuming NNS (n = 100). Sucralose was the largest contributor of mean daily NNS intake by weight (mg), followed by aspartame, acesulfame potassium, and saccharin. NNS in tabletop sweeteners, diet tea, and diet soda were the top contributors to absolute NNS intake. The most frequently consumed NNS sources were diet sodas, juice drinks, and tabletop sweeteners. Although mean body mass index (BMI) was greater for NNS consumers, they demonstrated significantly lower food, beverage, and SSB caloric intake and energy density, and higher overall dietary quality. It remains unclear whether NNS use plays a role in exacerbating weight gain. NNS consumers in this sample may have switched from drinking predominantly SSB to drinking some NNS beverages in an effort to cope with weight gain. Future studies should explore motivations for NNS use across a variety of weight and health categories.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/7/757non-nutritive sweetenersartificial sweetenersdietary assessmenthuman nutritionrural region
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valisa E. Hedrick
Erin M. Passaro
Brenda M. Davy
Wen You
Jamie M. Zoellner
spellingShingle Valisa E. Hedrick
Erin M. Passaro
Brenda M. Davy
Wen You
Jamie M. Zoellner
Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
Nutrients
non-nutritive sweeteners
artificial sweeteners
dietary assessment
human nutrition
rural region
author_facet Valisa E. Hedrick
Erin M. Passaro
Brenda M. Davy
Wen You
Jamie M. Zoellner
author_sort Valisa E. Hedrick
title Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
title_short Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
title_full Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
title_fullStr Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Non-Nutritive Sweetener Intake in Rural Southwest Virginian Adults Living in a Health-Disparate Region
title_sort characterization of non-nutritive sweetener intake in rural southwest virginian adults living in a health-disparate region
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Few data assessing non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) intake are available, especially within rural, health-disparate populations, where obesity and related co-morbidities are prevalent. The objective of this study is to characterize NNS intake for this population and examine the variance in demographics, cardio-metabolic outcomes, and dietary intake between NNS consumers and non-consumers. A cross-sectional sample (n = 301) of Virginian adults from a randomized controlled trial (data collected from 2012 to 2014) targeting sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake completed three 24-h dietary recalls, and demographics and cardio-metabolic measures were assessed. The frequency, types, and sources of NNS consumption were identified. Thirty-three percent of participants reported consuming NNS (n = 100). Sucralose was the largest contributor of mean daily NNS intake by weight (mg), followed by aspartame, acesulfame potassium, and saccharin. NNS in tabletop sweeteners, diet tea, and diet soda were the top contributors to absolute NNS intake. The most frequently consumed NNS sources were diet sodas, juice drinks, and tabletop sweeteners. Although mean body mass index (BMI) was greater for NNS consumers, they demonstrated significantly lower food, beverage, and SSB caloric intake and energy density, and higher overall dietary quality. It remains unclear whether NNS use plays a role in exacerbating weight gain. NNS consumers in this sample may have switched from drinking predominantly SSB to drinking some NNS beverages in an effort to cope with weight gain. Future studies should explore motivations for NNS use across a variety of weight and health categories.
topic non-nutritive sweeteners
artificial sweeteners
dietary assessment
human nutrition
rural region
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/7/757
work_keys_str_mv AT valisaehedrick characterizationofnonnutritivesweetenerintakeinruralsouthwestvirginianadultslivinginahealthdisparateregion
AT erinmpassaro characterizationofnonnutritivesweetenerintakeinruralsouthwestvirginianadultslivinginahealthdisparateregion
AT brendamdavy characterizationofnonnutritivesweetenerintakeinruralsouthwestvirginianadultslivinginahealthdisparateregion
AT wenyou characterizationofnonnutritivesweetenerintakeinruralsouthwestvirginianadultslivinginahealthdisparateregion
AT jamiemzoellner characterizationofnonnutritivesweetenerintakeinruralsouthwestvirginianadultslivinginahealthdisparateregion
_version_ 1725829941059125248