Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

As many similar symptoms are reported in fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), underlying defcits may potentially also be similar. Postural disequilibrium reported in both conditions may thus be explained by similar deviations in postural control strategies. 75 females (25/group FM,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omid Rasouli, Ottar Vasseljen, Egil A Fors, Håvard W Lorås, Ann-Katrin Stensdotter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5884530?pdf=render
id doaj-2a537b6a311242f5a44c8b610c3ab22d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a537b6a311242f5a44c8b610c3ab22d2020-11-25T01:24:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01134e019511110.1371/journal.pone.0195111Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.Omid RasouliOttar VasseljenEgil A ForsHåvard W LoråsAnn-Katrin StensdotterAs many similar symptoms are reported in fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), underlying defcits may potentially also be similar. Postural disequilibrium reported in both conditions may thus be explained by similar deviations in postural control strategies. 75 females (25/group FM, CFS and control, age 19-49 years) performed 60 s of quiet standing on a force platform in each of three conditions: 1) firm surface with vision, 2) firm surface without vision and, 3) compliant surface with vision. Migration of center of pressure was decomposed into a slow and a fast component denoting postural sway and lateral forces controlling postural sway, analyzed in the time and frequency domains. Main effects of group for the antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) directions showed that patients displayed larger amplitudes (AP, p = 0.002; ML, p = 0.021) and lower frequencies (AP, p < 0.001; ML, p < 0.001) for the slow component, as well as for the fast component (amplitudes: AP, p = 0.010; ML, p = 0.001 and frequencies: AP, p = 0.001; ML, p = 0.029) compared to controls. Post hoc analyses showed no significant differences between patient groups. In conclusion, both the CFS- and the FM-group differed from the control group. Larger postural sway and insufficient control was found in patients compared to controls, with no significant differences between the two patient groups.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5884530?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omid Rasouli
Ottar Vasseljen
Egil A Fors
Håvard W Lorås
Ann-Katrin Stensdotter
spellingShingle Omid Rasouli
Ottar Vasseljen
Egil A Fors
Håvard W Lorås
Ann-Katrin Stensdotter
Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Omid Rasouli
Ottar Vasseljen
Egil A Fors
Håvard W Lorås
Ann-Katrin Stensdotter
author_sort Omid Rasouli
title Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
title_short Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
title_full Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
title_fullStr Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
title_full_unstemmed Lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
title_sort lower regulatory frequency for postural control in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description As many similar symptoms are reported in fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), underlying defcits may potentially also be similar. Postural disequilibrium reported in both conditions may thus be explained by similar deviations in postural control strategies. 75 females (25/group FM, CFS and control, age 19-49 years) performed 60 s of quiet standing on a force platform in each of three conditions: 1) firm surface with vision, 2) firm surface without vision and, 3) compliant surface with vision. Migration of center of pressure was decomposed into a slow and a fast component denoting postural sway and lateral forces controlling postural sway, analyzed in the time and frequency domains. Main effects of group for the antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) directions showed that patients displayed larger amplitudes (AP, p = 0.002; ML, p = 0.021) and lower frequencies (AP, p < 0.001; ML, p < 0.001) for the slow component, as well as for the fast component (amplitudes: AP, p = 0.010; ML, p = 0.001 and frequencies: AP, p = 0.001; ML, p = 0.029) compared to controls. Post hoc analyses showed no significant differences between patient groups. In conclusion, both the CFS- and the FM-group differed from the control group. Larger postural sway and insufficient control was found in patients compared to controls, with no significant differences between the two patient groups.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5884530?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT omidrasouli lowerregulatoryfrequencyforposturalcontrolinpatientswithfibromyalgiaandchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT ottarvasseljen lowerregulatoryfrequencyforposturalcontrolinpatientswithfibromyalgiaandchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT egilafors lowerregulatoryfrequencyforposturalcontrolinpatientswithfibromyalgiaandchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT havardwloras lowerregulatoryfrequencyforposturalcontrolinpatientswithfibromyalgiaandchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT annkatrinstensdotter lowerregulatoryfrequencyforposturalcontrolinpatientswithfibromyalgiaandchronicfatiguesyndrome
_version_ 1725118010862075904