Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Current research suggests that the neuropathology of dementia-including brain changes leading to memory impairment and cognitive decline-is evident years before the onset of this disease. Older adults with cognitive decline have reduced functional independence and qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niousha Bolandzadeh, Konrad Kording, Nicole Salowitz, Jennifer C Davis, Liang Hsu, Alison Chan, Devika Sharma, Gunnar Blohm, Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119075
id doaj-2a50b78d4afa4f7aa703759af9edc9da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a50b78d4afa4f7aa703759af9edc9da2021-03-04T08:34:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011907510.1371/journal.pone.0119075Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.Niousha BolandzadehKonrad KordingNicole SalowitzJennifer C DavisLiang HsuAlison ChanDevika SharmaGunnar BlohmTeresa Liu-Ambrose<h4>Introduction</h4>Current research suggests that the neuropathology of dementia-including brain changes leading to memory impairment and cognitive decline-is evident years before the onset of this disease. Older adults with cognitive decline have reduced functional independence and quality of life, and are at greater risk for developing dementia. Therefore, identifying biomarkers that can be easily assessed within the clinical setting and predict cognitive decline is important. Early recognition of cognitive decline could promote timely implementation of preventive strategies.<h4>Methods</h4>We included 89 community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and older in our study, and collected 32 measures of physical function, health status and cognitive function at baseline. We utilized an L1-L2 regularized regression model (elastic net) to identify which of the 32 baseline measures were strongly predictive of cognitive function after one year. We built three linear regression models: 1) based on baseline cognitive function, 2) based on variables consistently selected in every cross-validation loop, and 3) a full model based on all the 32 variables. Each of these models was carefully tested with nested cross-validation.<h4>Results</h4>Our model with the six variables consistently selected in every cross-validation loop had a mean squared prediction error of 7.47. This number was smaller than that of the full model (115.33) and the model with baseline cognitive function (7.98). Our model explained 47% of the variance in cognitive function after one year.<h4>Discussion</h4>We built a parsimonious model based on a selected set of six physical function and health status measures strongly predictive of cognitive function after one year. In addition to reducing the complexity of the model without changing the model significantly, our model with the top variables improved the mean prediction error and R-squared. These six physical function and health status measures can be easily implemented in a clinical setting.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119075
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niousha Bolandzadeh
Konrad Kording
Nicole Salowitz
Jennifer C Davis
Liang Hsu
Alison Chan
Devika Sharma
Gunnar Blohm
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
spellingShingle Niousha Bolandzadeh
Konrad Kording
Nicole Salowitz
Jennifer C Davis
Liang Hsu
Alison Chan
Devika Sharma
Gunnar Blohm
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Niousha Bolandzadeh
Konrad Kording
Nicole Salowitz
Jennifer C Davis
Liang Hsu
Alison Chan
Devika Sharma
Gunnar Blohm
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
author_sort Niousha Bolandzadeh
title Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
title_short Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
title_full Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
title_fullStr Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
title_full_unstemmed Predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
title_sort predicting cognitive function from clinical measures of physical function and health status in older adults.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Current research suggests that the neuropathology of dementia-including brain changes leading to memory impairment and cognitive decline-is evident years before the onset of this disease. Older adults with cognitive decline have reduced functional independence and quality of life, and are at greater risk for developing dementia. Therefore, identifying biomarkers that can be easily assessed within the clinical setting and predict cognitive decline is important. Early recognition of cognitive decline could promote timely implementation of preventive strategies.<h4>Methods</h4>We included 89 community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and older in our study, and collected 32 measures of physical function, health status and cognitive function at baseline. We utilized an L1-L2 regularized regression model (elastic net) to identify which of the 32 baseline measures were strongly predictive of cognitive function after one year. We built three linear regression models: 1) based on baseline cognitive function, 2) based on variables consistently selected in every cross-validation loop, and 3) a full model based on all the 32 variables. Each of these models was carefully tested with nested cross-validation.<h4>Results</h4>Our model with the six variables consistently selected in every cross-validation loop had a mean squared prediction error of 7.47. This number was smaller than that of the full model (115.33) and the model with baseline cognitive function (7.98). Our model explained 47% of the variance in cognitive function after one year.<h4>Discussion</h4>We built a parsimonious model based on a selected set of six physical function and health status measures strongly predictive of cognitive function after one year. In addition to reducing the complexity of the model without changing the model significantly, our model with the top variables improved the mean prediction error and R-squared. These six physical function and health status measures can be easily implemented in a clinical setting.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119075
work_keys_str_mv AT nioushabolandzadeh predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT konradkording predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT nicolesalowitz predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT jennifercdavis predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT lianghsu predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT alisonchan predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT devikasharma predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT gunnarblohm predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
AT teresaliuambrose predictingcognitivefunctionfromclinicalmeasuresofphysicalfunctionandhealthstatusinolderadults
_version_ 1714807760181264384