Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process

We describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiina Kortteisto, Jorma Komulainen, Ilkka Kunnamo, Marjukka Mäkelä, Minna Kaila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association 2012-10-01
Series:Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916
id doaj-2a4f4c8d4cb74803840976144b3e780b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a4f4c8d4cb74803840976144b3e780b2021-04-21T13:11:15ZengFinnish Social and Health Informatics AssociationFinnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare1798-07982012-10-0143Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the processTiina Kortteisto0Jorma Komulainen1Ilkka Kunnamo2Marjukka Mäkelä3Minna Kaila4School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, TampereCurrent Care Guidelines, Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and National Institute of Health and Welfare, HelsinkiDuodecim Medical Publications Ltd., HelsinkiFinnish Office for Technology Assessment at National Institute for Health and Welfare, HelsinkiHjelt Institute, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiWe describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support the implementation. The actual use was measured by means of a questionnaire and statistical data. The implementation process consisted of three successive training rounds and lasted for 18 months. After 12 months the reported actual use of the eCDS functions was diverse. The study indicates that successful implementation of eCDS requires time and repeated supportive input. Primary care professionals need time and training for adapting eCDS in their daily routine. In addition, the eCDS content should be tailored to fulfil different professionals’ information needs in primary care practice.https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916clinical decision supportelectronic patient recordguidelineimplementationinformation technologyprimary care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tiina Kortteisto
Jorma Komulainen
Ilkka Kunnamo
Marjukka Mäkelä
Minna Kaila
spellingShingle Tiina Kortteisto
Jorma Komulainen
Ilkka Kunnamo
Marjukka Mäkelä
Minna Kaila
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
clinical decision support
electronic patient record
guideline
implementation
information technology
primary care
author_facet Tiina Kortteisto
Jorma Komulainen
Ilkka Kunnamo
Marjukka Mäkelä
Minna Kaila
author_sort Tiina Kortteisto
title Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
title_short Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
title_full Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
title_fullStr Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
title_full_unstemmed Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
title_sort implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
publisher Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association
series Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
issn 1798-0798
publishDate 2012-10-01
description We describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support the implementation. The actual use was measured by means of a questionnaire and statistical data. The implementation process consisted of three successive training rounds and lasted for 18 months. After 12 months the reported actual use of the eCDS functions was diverse. The study indicates that successful implementation of eCDS requires time and repeated supportive input. Primary care professionals need time and training for adapting eCDS in their daily routine. In addition, the eCDS content should be tailored to fulfil different professionals’ information needs in primary care practice.
topic clinical decision support
electronic patient record
guideline
implementation
information technology
primary care
url https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916
work_keys_str_mv AT tiinakortteisto implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess
AT jormakomulainen implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess
AT ilkkakunnamo implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess
AT marjukkamakela implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess
AT minnakaila implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess
_version_ 1721516301278511104