Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process
We describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support th...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916 |
id |
doaj-2a4f4c8d4cb74803840976144b3e780b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a4f4c8d4cb74803840976144b3e780b2021-04-21T13:11:15ZengFinnish Social and Health Informatics AssociationFinnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare1798-07982012-10-0143Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the processTiina Kortteisto0Jorma Komulainen1Ilkka Kunnamo2Marjukka Mäkelä3Minna Kaila4School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, TampereCurrent Care Guidelines, Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and National Institute of Health and Welfare, HelsinkiDuodecim Medical Publications Ltd., HelsinkiFinnish Office for Technology Assessment at National Institute for Health and Welfare, HelsinkiHjelt Institute, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiWe describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support the implementation. The actual use was measured by means of a questionnaire and statistical data. The implementation process consisted of three successive training rounds and lasted for 18 months. After 12 months the reported actual use of the eCDS functions was diverse. The study indicates that successful implementation of eCDS requires time and repeated supportive input. Primary care professionals need time and training for adapting eCDS in their daily routine. In addition, the eCDS content should be tailored to fulfil different professionals’ information needs in primary care practice.https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916clinical decision supportelectronic patient recordguidelineimplementationinformation technologyprimary care |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tiina Kortteisto Jorma Komulainen Ilkka Kunnamo Marjukka Mäkelä Minna Kaila |
spellingShingle |
Tiina Kortteisto Jorma Komulainen Ilkka Kunnamo Marjukka Mäkelä Minna Kaila Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare clinical decision support electronic patient record guideline implementation information technology primary care |
author_facet |
Tiina Kortteisto Jorma Komulainen Ilkka Kunnamo Marjukka Mäkelä Minna Kaila |
author_sort |
Tiina Kortteisto |
title |
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
title_short |
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
title_full |
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
title_fullStr |
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
title_sort |
implementing clinical decision support for primary care professionals – the process |
publisher |
Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association |
series |
Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare |
issn |
1798-0798 |
publishDate |
2012-10-01 |
description |
We describe the process of putting into practice a computer-based clinical decision support (eCDS) service integrated in the electronic patient record, and the actual use of eCDS after one year in a primary care organization with 48 health care professionals. Multiple methods were used to support the implementation. The actual use was measured by means of a questionnaire and statistical data. The implementation process consisted of three
successive training rounds and lasted for 18 months. After 12 months the reported actual use of the eCDS functions was diverse. The study indicates that successful implementation of eCDS requires time and repeated supportive input. Primary care professionals need time and training for adapting eCDS in their daily routine. In addition, the eCDS content should be tailored to fulfil different professionals’ information needs in primary care practice. |
topic |
clinical decision support electronic patient record guideline implementation information technology primary care |
url |
https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/6916 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tiinakortteisto implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess AT jormakomulainen implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess AT ilkkakunnamo implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess AT marjukkamakela implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess AT minnakaila implementingclinicaldecisionsupportforprimarycareprofessionalstheprocess |
_version_ |
1721516301278511104 |