Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique

During the summer 1954 at Biot (Alpes-Maritimes)), an original exhibition was organised by the Espace group, entitled ‘Architecture, Forms, Colour’. The aim of this association founded in 1951 by André Bloc and Félix Del Marle was to achieve the synthesis of the arts in everyday life by the joint in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diana Gay
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication 2017-07-01
Series:In Situ : Revue de Patrimoines
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/insitu/14660
id doaj-2a42a8998f6842f4a19c13a602778f9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a42a8998f6842f4a19c13a602778f9b2020-11-25T00:05:19ZfraMinistère de la Culture et de la CommunicationIn Situ : Revue de Patrimoines1630-73052017-07-013210.4000/insitu.14660Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critiqueDiana GayDuring the summer 1954 at Biot (Alpes-Maritimes)), an original exhibition was organised by the Espace group, entitled ‘Architecture, Forms, Colour’. The aim of this association founded in 1951 by André Bloc and Félix Del Marle was to achieve the synthesis of the arts in everyday life by the joint initiatives of architects and artists. During the years of post-war reconstruction in France, the group tried to set up projects but failed most of the time due to the lack of solidarity between the members and the disinterest manifested by the commissioning authorities and contractors. After the second outdoor exhibition in 1955 which took place at Saint-Cloud near Paris, the group slowly disintegrated. The evaluation of the Biot event is interesting for understanding the reasons for the failure of this collective utopia of the mid-1950s. Is it the continuation of the modernist period after the Second World War or is it the beginning of a critical modernity which opens the way to postmodernism?http://journals.openedition.org/insitu/14660Jean ArpAndré BlocDenis BrihatAndré BruyèreEugène Claudius-PetitGeorges Dedoyard
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana Gay
spellingShingle Diana Gay
Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
In Situ : Revue de Patrimoines
Jean Arp
André Bloc
Denis Brihat
André Bruyère
Eugène Claudius-Petit
Georges Dedoyard
author_facet Diana Gay
author_sort Diana Gay
title Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
title_short Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
title_full Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
title_fullStr Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
title_full_unstemmed Fernand Léger et le groupe Espace à Biot. Un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
title_sort fernand léger et le groupe espace à biot. un terrain d’expérimentation pour une modernité critique
publisher Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication
series In Situ : Revue de Patrimoines
issn 1630-7305
publishDate 2017-07-01
description During the summer 1954 at Biot (Alpes-Maritimes)), an original exhibition was organised by the Espace group, entitled ‘Architecture, Forms, Colour’. The aim of this association founded in 1951 by André Bloc and Félix Del Marle was to achieve the synthesis of the arts in everyday life by the joint initiatives of architects and artists. During the years of post-war reconstruction in France, the group tried to set up projects but failed most of the time due to the lack of solidarity between the members and the disinterest manifested by the commissioning authorities and contractors. After the second outdoor exhibition in 1955 which took place at Saint-Cloud near Paris, the group slowly disintegrated. The evaluation of the Biot event is interesting for understanding the reasons for the failure of this collective utopia of the mid-1950s. Is it the continuation of the modernist period after the Second World War or is it the beginning of a critical modernity which opens the way to postmodernism?
topic Jean Arp
André Bloc
Denis Brihat
André Bruyère
Eugène Claudius-Petit
Georges Dedoyard
url http://journals.openedition.org/insitu/14660
work_keys_str_mv AT dianagay fernandlegeretlegroupeespaceabiotunterraindexperimentationpourunemodernitecritique
_version_ 1725425755991572480