Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities

Identifying and quantifying the sources of climate impacts from land use and land cover change (LULCC) is necessary to optimize policies regarding LULCC for climate change mitigation. These climate impacts are typically defined relative to emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, or sometimes emissi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. S. Ward, N. M. Mahowald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Earth System Dynamics
Online Access:http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/175/2015/esd-6-175-2015.pdf
id doaj-2a38f0dabd96471db03974495e6d7c0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a38f0dabd96471db03974495e6d7c0b2020-11-25T00:43:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth System Dynamics2190-49792190-49872015-04-016117519410.5194/esd-6-175-2015Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activitiesD. S. Ward0N. M. Mahowald1Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USADepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USAIdentifying and quantifying the sources of climate impacts from land use and land cover change (LULCC) is necessary to optimize policies regarding LULCC for climate change mitigation. These climate impacts are typically defined relative to emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, or sometimes emissions of other long-lived greenhouse gases. Here we use previously published estimates of the radiative forcing (RF) of LULCC that include the short-lived forcing agents O<sub>3</sub> and aerosols, in addition to long-lived greenhouse gases and land albedo change, for six projections of LULCC as a metric for quantifying climate impacts. The LULCC RF is attributed to three categories of LULCC activities: direct modifications to land cover, agriculture, and wildfire response, and sources of the forcing are ascribed to individual grid points for each sector. Results for the year 2010 show substantial positive forcings from the direct modifications and agriculture sectors, particularly from south and southeast Asia, and a smaller magnitude negative forcing response from wildfires. The spatial distribution of future sources of LULCC RF is highly scenario-dependent, but we show that future forest area change can be used as a predictor of the future RF from direct modification activities, especially in the tropics, suggesting that deforestation-prevention policies that value land based on its C-content may be particularly effective at mitigating climate forcing originating in the tropics from this sector. However, the response of wildfire RF to tropical land cover changes is not as easily scalable and yet imposes a non-trivial feedback onto the total LULCC RF.http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/175/2015/esd-6-175-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. S. Ward
N. M. Mahowald
spellingShingle D. S. Ward
N. M. Mahowald
Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
Earth System Dynamics
author_facet D. S. Ward
N. M. Mahowald
author_sort D. S. Ward
title Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
title_short Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
title_full Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
title_fullStr Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
title_full_unstemmed Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
title_sort local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth System Dynamics
issn 2190-4979
2190-4987
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Identifying and quantifying the sources of climate impacts from land use and land cover change (LULCC) is necessary to optimize policies regarding LULCC for climate change mitigation. These climate impacts are typically defined relative to emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, or sometimes emissions of other long-lived greenhouse gases. Here we use previously published estimates of the radiative forcing (RF) of LULCC that include the short-lived forcing agents O<sub>3</sub> and aerosols, in addition to long-lived greenhouse gases and land albedo change, for six projections of LULCC as a metric for quantifying climate impacts. The LULCC RF is attributed to three categories of LULCC activities: direct modifications to land cover, agriculture, and wildfire response, and sources of the forcing are ascribed to individual grid points for each sector. Results for the year 2010 show substantial positive forcings from the direct modifications and agriculture sectors, particularly from south and southeast Asia, and a smaller magnitude negative forcing response from wildfires. The spatial distribution of future sources of LULCC RF is highly scenario-dependent, but we show that future forest area change can be used as a predictor of the future RF from direct modification activities, especially in the tropics, suggesting that deforestation-prevention policies that value land based on its C-content may be particularly effective at mitigating climate forcing originating in the tropics from this sector. However, the response of wildfire RF to tropical land cover changes is not as easily scalable and yet imposes a non-trivial feedback onto the total LULCC RF.
url http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/6/175/2015/esd-6-175-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dsward localsourcesofglobalclimateforcingfromdifferentcategoriesoflanduseactivities
AT nmmahowald localsourcesofglobalclimateforcingfromdifferentcategoriesoflanduseactivities
_version_ 1725277936036085760