Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?

The somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis has eventually accumulated an impressive body of shortfalls and paradoxes, as admittedly claimed by its own supporters given that the cell-based approach can hardly explain the emergence of tissue-based processes, like cancer. However, experimental data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariano Bizzarri, Alessandra Cucina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/934038
id doaj-2a1d9b868c8c4b7cae2f3b33ed55c66c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a1d9b868c8c4b7cae2f3b33ed55c66c2020-11-24T23:54:05ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/934038934038Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?Mariano Bizzarri0Alessandra Cucina1Department of Experimental Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Systems Biology Group, Viale Regina Elena 324, Via A. Scarpa 14, 00161 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via A. Scarpa 14, 00161 Rome, ItalyThe somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis has eventually accumulated an impressive body of shortfalls and paradoxes, as admittedly claimed by its own supporters given that the cell-based approach can hardly explain the emergence of tissue-based processes, like cancer. However, experimental data and alternatives theories developed during the last decades may actually provide a new framework on which cancer research should be reframed. Such issue may be fulfilled embracing new theoretical perspectives, taking the cells-microenvironment interplay as the privileged level of observation and assuming radically different premises as well as new methodological frameworks. Within that perspective, the tumor microenvironment cannot be merely considered akin to new “factor” to be added to an already long list of “signaling factors”; microenvironment represents the physical-biochemical support of the morphogenetic field which drives epithelial cells towards differentiation and phenotype transformation, according to rules understandable only by means of a systems biology approach. That endeavour entails three fundamental aspects: general biological premises, the level of observation (i.e., the systems to which we are looking for), and the principles of biological organization that would help in integrating and understanding experimental data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/934038
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariano Bizzarri
Alessandra Cucina
spellingShingle Mariano Bizzarri
Alessandra Cucina
Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
BioMed Research International
author_facet Mariano Bizzarri
Alessandra Cucina
author_sort Mariano Bizzarri
title Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
title_short Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
title_full Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
title_fullStr Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
title_full_unstemmed Tumor and the Microenvironment: A Chance to Reframe the Paradigm of Carcinogenesis?
title_sort tumor and the microenvironment: a chance to reframe the paradigm of carcinogenesis?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis has eventually accumulated an impressive body of shortfalls and paradoxes, as admittedly claimed by its own supporters given that the cell-based approach can hardly explain the emergence of tissue-based processes, like cancer. However, experimental data and alternatives theories developed during the last decades may actually provide a new framework on which cancer research should be reframed. Such issue may be fulfilled embracing new theoretical perspectives, taking the cells-microenvironment interplay as the privileged level of observation and assuming radically different premises as well as new methodological frameworks. Within that perspective, the tumor microenvironment cannot be merely considered akin to new “factor” to be added to an already long list of “signaling factors”; microenvironment represents the physical-biochemical support of the morphogenetic field which drives epithelial cells towards differentiation and phenotype transformation, according to rules understandable only by means of a systems biology approach. That endeavour entails three fundamental aspects: general biological premises, the level of observation (i.e., the systems to which we are looking for), and the principles of biological organization that would help in integrating and understanding experimental data.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/934038
work_keys_str_mv AT marianobizzarri tumorandthemicroenvironmentachancetoreframetheparadigmofcarcinogenesis
AT alessandracucina tumorandthemicroenvironmentachancetoreframetheparadigmofcarcinogenesis
_version_ 1725467363539681280