Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach

Abstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-mak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi, Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, Maryam Ghezelbash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-02-01
Series:Financial Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4
id doaj-2a1a188da7b14e47a7469f71a7406cdd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a1a188da7b14e47a7469f71a7406cdd2020-11-25T01:02:32ZengSpringerOpenFinancial Innovation2199-47302020-02-016113410.1186/s40854-020-00175-4Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approachMasoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi0Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei1Maryam Ghezelbash2Department of Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares UniversityDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares UniversityDepartment of Industrial, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Buein Zahra Technical UniversityAbstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-making criteria. However, there are many other important criteria that have been neglected. To fill this gap, first, a literature review was conducted to determine the main criteria for portfolio selection, and a Likert-type questionnaire was then used to finalize a list of criteria. Second, the finalized criteria were applied in an FANP to rank 10 different TSE portfolios. The results indicated that profitability, growth, market, and risk are the most important criteria for portfolio selection. Additionally, portfolios 6, 7, 2, 4, 8, 1, 5, 3, 9, and 10 (A6, A7, A2, A4, A8, A1, A5, A3, A9, and A10) were found to be the best choices. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4Portfolio selectionFinancial engineeringFuzzy analytic network process (FANP)Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi
Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei
Maryam Ghezelbash
spellingShingle Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi
Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei
Maryam Ghezelbash
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
Financial Innovation
Portfolio selection
Financial engineering
Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP)
Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
author_facet Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi
Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei
Maryam Ghezelbash
author_sort Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi
title Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
title_short Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
title_full Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
title_fullStr Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
title_full_unstemmed Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
title_sort portfolio selection: a fuzzy-anp approach
publisher SpringerOpen
series Financial Innovation
issn 2199-4730
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-making criteria. However, there are many other important criteria that have been neglected. To fill this gap, first, a literature review was conducted to determine the main criteria for portfolio selection, and a Likert-type questionnaire was then used to finalize a list of criteria. Second, the finalized criteria were applied in an FANP to rank 10 different TSE portfolios. The results indicated that profitability, growth, market, and risk are the most important criteria for portfolio selection. Additionally, portfolios 6, 7, 2, 4, 8, 1, 5, 3, 9, and 10 (A6, A7, A2, A4, A8, A1, A5, A3, A9, and A10) were found to be the best choices. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
topic Portfolio selection
Financial engineering
Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP)
Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4
work_keys_str_mv AT masoudrahiminezhadgalankashi portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach
AT farimahmokhatabrafiei portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach
AT maryamghezelbash portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach
_version_ 1725204273184112640