Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach
Abstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-mak...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Financial Innovation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4 |
id |
doaj-2a1a188da7b14e47a7469f71a7406cdd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a1a188da7b14e47a7469f71a7406cdd2020-11-25T01:02:32ZengSpringerOpenFinancial Innovation2199-47302020-02-016113410.1186/s40854-020-00175-4Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approachMasoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi0Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei1Maryam Ghezelbash2Department of Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares UniversityDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares UniversityDepartment of Industrial, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Buein Zahra Technical UniversityAbstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-making criteria. However, there are many other important criteria that have been neglected. To fill this gap, first, a literature review was conducted to determine the main criteria for portfolio selection, and a Likert-type questionnaire was then used to finalize a list of criteria. Second, the finalized criteria were applied in an FANP to rank 10 different TSE portfolios. The results indicated that profitability, growth, market, and risk are the most important criteria for portfolio selection. Additionally, portfolios 6, 7, 2, 4, 8, 1, 5, 3, 9, and 10 (A6, A7, A2, A4, A8, A1, A5, A3, A9, and A10) were found to be the best choices. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4Portfolio selectionFinancial engineeringFuzzy analytic network process (FANP)Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei Maryam Ghezelbash |
spellingShingle |
Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei Maryam Ghezelbash Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach Financial Innovation Portfolio selection Financial engineering Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) |
author_facet |
Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei Maryam Ghezelbash |
author_sort |
Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi |
title |
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach |
title_short |
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach |
title_full |
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach |
title_fullStr |
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach |
title_sort |
portfolio selection: a fuzzy-anp approach |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Financial Innovation |
issn |
2199-4730 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract This study developed specific criteria and a fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to assess and select portfolios on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Although the portfolio selection problem has been widely investigated, most studies have focused on income and risk as the main decision-making criteria. However, there are many other important criteria that have been neglected. To fill this gap, first, a literature review was conducted to determine the main criteria for portfolio selection, and a Likert-type questionnaire was then used to finalize a list of criteria. Second, the finalized criteria were applied in an FANP to rank 10 different TSE portfolios. The results indicated that profitability, growth, market, and risk are the most important criteria for portfolio selection. Additionally, portfolios 6, 7, 2, 4, 8, 1, 5, 3, 9, and 10 (A6, A7, A2, A4, A8, A1, A5, A3, A9, and A10) were found to be the best choices. Implications and directions for future research are discussed. |
topic |
Portfolio selection Financial engineering Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00175-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT masoudrahiminezhadgalankashi portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach AT farimahmokhatabrafiei portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach AT maryamghezelbash portfolioselectionafuzzyanpapproach |
_version_ |
1725204273184112640 |