Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council

Since its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Mal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ying Hooi Khoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2014-05-01
Series:Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755
id doaj-2a1069f5834c43a7bf0e8e4cb90ab99c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a1069f5834c43a7bf0e8e4cb90ab99c2020-11-24T22:09:09ZengUTS ePRESSCosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal1837-53912014-05-016110.5130/ccs.v6i1.37552533Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights CouncilYing Hooi Khoo0University of MalayaSince its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Malaysia in 2009, in order to illustrate how the mechanism operates in practice by highlighting the engagement of Malaysia government with the stakeholders, the follow-up process and the main issues concerned. This article argues that in spite of the excellent diplomacy skills that portrayed by the Malaysian government in the UPR session, the human rights situation in the country has not been improved much. This paper seeks to determine how effective the UPR has been at encouraging human rights reforms nationally by analyzing and assessing the implementation actions of Malaysian government in response to their accepted UPR recommendations.https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755Malaysiahuman rightsUnited Nations Human Rights CouncilUniversal Periodic ReviewHuman Rights Commission of Malaysia.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ying Hooi Khoo
spellingShingle Ying Hooi Khoo
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Malaysia
human rights
United Nations Human Rights Council
Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia.
author_facet Ying Hooi Khoo
author_sort Ying Hooi Khoo
title Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
title_short Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
title_full Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
title_fullStr Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
title_full_unstemmed Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
title_sort malaysia's human rights performance: assessment of its first session of universal periodic review in the united nations human rights council
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal
issn 1837-5391
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Since its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Malaysia in 2009, in order to illustrate how the mechanism operates in practice by highlighting the engagement of Malaysia government with the stakeholders, the follow-up process and the main issues concerned. This article argues that in spite of the excellent diplomacy skills that portrayed by the Malaysian government in the UPR session, the human rights situation in the country has not been improved much. This paper seeks to determine how effective the UPR has been at encouraging human rights reforms nationally by analyzing and assessing the implementation actions of Malaysian government in response to their accepted UPR recommendations.
topic Malaysia
human rights
United Nations Human Rights Council
Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia.
url https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755
work_keys_str_mv AT yinghooikhoo malaysiashumanrightsperformanceassessmentofitsfirstsessionofuniversalperiodicreviewintheunitednationshumanrightscouncil
_version_ 1725813431136681984