Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council
Since its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Mal...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UTS ePRESS
2014-05-01
|
Series: | Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755 |
id |
doaj-2a1069f5834c43a7bf0e8e4cb90ab99c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a1069f5834c43a7bf0e8e4cb90ab99c2020-11-24T22:09:09ZengUTS ePRESSCosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal1837-53912014-05-016110.5130/ccs.v6i1.37552533Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights CouncilYing Hooi Khoo0University of MalayaSince its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Malaysia in 2009, in order to illustrate how the mechanism operates in practice by highlighting the engagement of Malaysia government with the stakeholders, the follow-up process and the main issues concerned. This article argues that in spite of the excellent diplomacy skills that portrayed by the Malaysian government in the UPR session, the human rights situation in the country has not been improved much. This paper seeks to determine how effective the UPR has been at encouraging human rights reforms nationally by analyzing and assessing the implementation actions of Malaysian government in response to their accepted UPR recommendations.https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755Malaysiahuman rightsUnited Nations Human Rights CouncilUniversal Periodic ReviewHuman Rights Commission of Malaysia. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ying Hooi Khoo |
spellingShingle |
Ying Hooi Khoo Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal Malaysia human rights United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. |
author_facet |
Ying Hooi Khoo |
author_sort |
Ying Hooi Khoo |
title |
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council |
title_short |
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council |
title_full |
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council |
title_fullStr |
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council |
title_full_unstemmed |
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance: Assessment of its First Session of Universal Periodic Review in the United Nations Human Rights Council |
title_sort |
malaysia's human rights performance: assessment of its first session of universal periodic review in the united nations human rights council |
publisher |
UTS ePRESS |
series |
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal |
issn |
1837-5391 |
publishDate |
2014-05-01 |
description |
Since its inception, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has been subjected to a substantial amount of criticism. The mechanism began functioning in 2008, however there have been little made known about the roles and functions of the UPR. This article explicitly examines the first UPR process of Malaysia in 2009, in order to illustrate how the mechanism operates in practice by highlighting the engagement of Malaysia government with the stakeholders, the follow-up process and the main issues concerned. This article argues that in spite of the excellent diplomacy skills that portrayed by the Malaysian government in the UPR session, the human rights situation in the country has not been improved much. This paper seeks to determine how effective the UPR has been at encouraging human rights reforms nationally by analyzing and assessing the implementation actions of Malaysian government in response to their accepted UPR recommendations. |
topic |
Malaysia human rights United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. |
url |
https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/3755 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yinghooikhoo malaysiashumanrightsperformanceassessmentofitsfirstsessionofuniversalperiodicreviewintheunitednationshumanrightscouncil |
_version_ |
1725813431136681984 |