Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
This paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-2a0b3a5a2d7d48758dc8800446299c15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2a0b3a5a2d7d48758dc8800446299c152020-11-25T02:06:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011310e020589210.1371/journal.pone.0205892Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.Elena AndradeDolores RodríguezThis paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the factor structure of the questionnaire in training sessions by using two different time frames: 'right now' (n = 350) and 'past week' (n = 350). In the second study (N = 446), we compared the factor structure of the questionnaire with data collected using the instruction 'right now' at two different circumstances: 'training' (n = 223) and 'competition' (n = 223). Data analysis was similar in both studies. We conducted multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and applied the scaled difference chi-square statistic to examine whether discrepancies in successive constrained models were significant. We observed configural equivalence between the two time frames. Furthermore, we observed metric equivalence but not scalar invariance between the different circumstances of measurement. The findings highlight the need for studies of equivalence before using a single self-report with more than one set of instructions, or under diverse circumstances. Invariance of mood scores should be examined and taken into account when interpreting individual and group mood state assessments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elena Andrade Dolores Rodríguez |
spellingShingle |
Elena Andrade Dolores Rodríguez Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Elena Andrade Dolores Rodríguez |
author_sort |
Elena Andrade |
title |
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. |
title_short |
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. |
title_full |
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. |
title_fullStr |
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. |
title_sort |
factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: two studies on the profile of mood states questionnaire. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the factor structure of the questionnaire in training sessions by using two different time frames: 'right now' (n = 350) and 'past week' (n = 350). In the second study (N = 446), we compared the factor structure of the questionnaire with data collected using the instruction 'right now' at two different circumstances: 'training' (n = 223) and 'competition' (n = 223). Data analysis was similar in both studies. We conducted multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and applied the scaled difference chi-square statistic to examine whether discrepancies in successive constrained models were significant. We observed configural equivalence between the two time frames. Furthermore, we observed metric equivalence but not scalar invariance between the different circumstances of measurement. The findings highlight the need for studies of equivalence before using a single self-report with more than one set of instructions, or under diverse circumstances. Invariance of mood scores should be examined and taken into account when interpreting individual and group mood state assessments. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elenaandrade factorstructureofmoodovertimeframesandcircumstancesofmeasurementtwostudiesontheprofileofmoodstatesquestionnaire AT doloresrodriguez factorstructureofmoodovertimeframesandcircumstancesofmeasurementtwostudiesontheprofileofmoodstatesquestionnaire |
_version_ |
1724933258253172736 |