Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.

This paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Andrade, Dolores Rodríguez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render
id doaj-2a0b3a5a2d7d48758dc8800446299c15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a0b3a5a2d7d48758dc8800446299c152020-11-25T02:06:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011310e020589210.1371/journal.pone.0205892Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.Elena AndradeDolores RodríguezThis paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the factor structure of the questionnaire in training sessions by using two different time frames: 'right now' (n = 350) and 'past week' (n = 350). In the second study (N = 446), we compared the factor structure of the questionnaire with data collected using the instruction 'right now' at two different circumstances: 'training' (n = 223) and 'competition' (n = 223). Data analysis was similar in both studies. We conducted multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and applied the scaled difference chi-square statistic to examine whether discrepancies in successive constrained models were significant. We observed configural equivalence between the two time frames. Furthermore, we observed metric equivalence but not scalar invariance between the different circumstances of measurement. The findings highlight the need for studies of equivalence before using a single self-report with more than one set of instructions, or under diverse circumstances. Invariance of mood scores should be examined and taken into account when interpreting individual and group mood state assessments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elena Andrade
Dolores Rodríguez
spellingShingle Elena Andrade
Dolores Rodríguez
Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Elena Andrade
Dolores Rodríguez
author_sort Elena Andrade
title Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
title_short Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
title_full Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
title_fullStr Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
title_full_unstemmed Factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: Two studies on the Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
title_sort factor structure of mood over time frames and circumstances of measurement: two studies on the profile of mood states questionnaire.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper presents the results of two studies on the invariance of the Profile of Mood States questionnaire across response time frames and circumstances of administration. We applied Spanish versions of the instrument to gather data from 1146 athletes. In the first study (N = 700), we tested the factor structure of the questionnaire in training sessions by using two different time frames: 'right now' (n = 350) and 'past week' (n = 350). In the second study (N = 446), we compared the factor structure of the questionnaire with data collected using the instruction 'right now' at two different circumstances: 'training' (n = 223) and 'competition' (n = 223). Data analysis was similar in both studies. We conducted multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and applied the scaled difference chi-square statistic to examine whether discrepancies in successive constrained models were significant. We observed configural equivalence between the two time frames. Furthermore, we observed metric equivalence but not scalar invariance between the different circumstances of measurement. The findings highlight the need for studies of equivalence before using a single self-report with more than one set of instructions, or under diverse circumstances. Invariance of mood scores should be examined and taken into account when interpreting individual and group mood state assessments.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6188867?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT elenaandrade factorstructureofmoodovertimeframesandcircumstancesofmeasurementtwostudiesontheprofileofmoodstatesquestionnaire
AT doloresrodriguez factorstructureofmoodovertimeframesandcircumstancesofmeasurementtwostudiesontheprofileofmoodstatesquestionnaire
_version_ 1724933258253172736