The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?

Although the European Court of Justice rendered its Weber/Putz judgment as long ago as three years, the turmoil since then in both academia and practice has not abated. Indeed, the significance of the ‘proportionality principle’ for European contract law can hardly be overestimated, as the ECJ basi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Hoffmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2014-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/175
id doaj-2a0447974b8641688e4d785d06f8c166
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a0447974b8641688e4d785d06f8c1662020-11-25T03:53:25ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582014-12-011038339310.3935/cyelp.10.2014.175The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?Thomas Hoffmann0Tartu UniversityAlthough the European Court of Justice rendered its Weber/Putz judgment as long ago as three years, the turmoil since then in both academia and practice has not abated. Indeed, the significance of the ‘proportionality principle’ for European contract law can hardly be overestimated, as the ECJ basically established by this judgment, with or without intent, a doctrine of general strict liability in contract law, which so far has only existed in but a few European legal systems beyond common law. This paper compares the reception of the Weber/Putz decision in a major Western European legal system (Germany) with the approach of a minor Central European legal system (Estonia), also taking into account the judgment’s impact on the future development of European contract law.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/175european court of justiceweber/putz judgmentproportionalityeuropean contract lawgeneral strict liabilitycommon lawgermanyestonia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Hoffmann
spellingShingle Thomas Hoffmann
The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
european court of justice
weber/putz judgment
proportionality
european contract law
general strict liability
common law
germany
estonia
author_facet Thomas Hoffmann
author_sort Thomas Hoffmann
title The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
title_short The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
title_full The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
title_fullStr The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
title_full_unstemmed The Weber/Putz ‘Proportionality Principle’: Determining Subsequent Performance Anew?
title_sort weber/putz ‘proportionality principle’: determining subsequent performance anew?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Although the European Court of Justice rendered its Weber/Putz judgment as long ago as three years, the turmoil since then in both academia and practice has not abated. Indeed, the significance of the ‘proportionality principle’ for European contract law can hardly be overestimated, as the ECJ basically established by this judgment, with or without intent, a doctrine of general strict liability in contract law, which so far has only existed in but a few European legal systems beyond common law. This paper compares the reception of the Weber/Putz decision in a major Western European legal system (Germany) with the approach of a minor Central European legal system (Estonia), also taking into account the judgment’s impact on the future development of European contract law.
topic european court of justice
weber/putz judgment
proportionality
european contract law
general strict liability
common law
germany
estonia
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/175
work_keys_str_mv AT thomashoffmann theweberputzproportionalityprincipledeterminingsubsequentperformanceanew
AT thomashoffmann weberputzproportionalityprincipledeterminingsubsequentperformanceanew
_version_ 1724478080327614464