Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.

In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV testing for all Americans aged 13-64, which would eliminate requirements for written consent and pretest counseling as previously required. However, this approach may conflict with state requirements conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leslie E Wolf, Alexis Donoghoe, Tim Lane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1994587?pdf=render
id doaj-29fe523131564ca08cc66df5de124bfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29fe523131564ca08cc66df5de124bfb2020-11-25T02:19:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-01-01210e100510.1371/journal.pone.0001005Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.Leslie E WolfAlexis DonoghoeTim LaneIn September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV testing for all Americans aged 13-64, which would eliminate requirements for written consent and pretest counseling as previously required. However, this approach may conflict with state requirements concerning pretest counseling and informed consent for HIV testing. Our survey of state HIV testing laws demonstrates that the majority of states have HIV testing requirements that are inconsistent with the CDC's recommendations. Moreover, states that have recently amended their laws have not eased the requirements for pretest counseling and informed consent. The reasons for the persistence of these legal requirements must be understood to effect policy changes to increase HIV testing.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1994587?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leslie E Wolf
Alexis Donoghoe
Tim Lane
spellingShingle Leslie E Wolf
Alexis Donoghoe
Tim Lane
Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Leslie E Wolf
Alexis Donoghoe
Tim Lane
author_sort Leslie E Wolf
title Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
title_short Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
title_full Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
title_fullStr Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
title_full_unstemmed Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
title_sort implementing routine hiv testing: the role of state law.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-01-01
description In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV testing for all Americans aged 13-64, which would eliminate requirements for written consent and pretest counseling as previously required. However, this approach may conflict with state requirements concerning pretest counseling and informed consent for HIV testing. Our survey of state HIV testing laws demonstrates that the majority of states have HIV testing requirements that are inconsistent with the CDC's recommendations. Moreover, states that have recently amended their laws have not eased the requirements for pretest counseling and informed consent. The reasons for the persistence of these legal requirements must be understood to effect policy changes to increase HIV testing.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1994587?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT leslieewolf implementingroutinehivtestingtheroleofstatelaw
AT alexisdonoghoe implementingroutinehivtestingtheroleofstatelaw
AT timlane implementingroutinehivtestingtheroleofstatelaw
_version_ 1724874187261083648