Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times
This paper investigates the impact of having open 400 meter (400 m) runners on NCAA relay teams. Using data from 2012–2016 containing the top 100 4 × 400 m in each NCAA Division relay times for each year, it is found that more 400 m specialists lead to an increase in the overall performance of the t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Economies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/96 |
id |
doaj-29fa394c92614c4bbf39fc8180f91445 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-29fa394c92614c4bbf39fc8180f914452020-11-25T04:04:38ZengMDPI AGEconomies2227-70992020-11-018969610.3390/economies8040096Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay TimesCandon Johnson0Robert Schultz1Joshua C. Hall2Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USAInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USAJohn Chambers College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USAThis paper investigates the impact of having open 400 meter (400 m) runners on NCAA relay teams. Using data from 2012–2016 containing the top 100 4 × 400 m in each NCAA Division relay times for each year, it is found that more 400 m specialists lead to an increase in the overall performance of the team, measured by a decrease in relay times. The effect is examined across Division I–III NCAA track teams. The results are consistent across each division. We view this as a test of the role of specialization on performance. Using runners who specialize in 400 m races should increase overall team performance as long as specialization does not lead to an inefficient allocation of team human capital. An additional performance measure is used examining the difference between projected and actual relay times. Divisions I and II are found to perform better than projected with an increase in 400 m runners, but there is no effect found in Division III.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/96specializationrunningpeer effectsDivision III |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Candon Johnson Robert Schultz Joshua C. Hall |
spellingShingle |
Candon Johnson Robert Schultz Joshua C. Hall Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times Economies specialization running peer effects Division III |
author_facet |
Candon Johnson Robert Schultz Joshua C. Hall |
author_sort |
Candon Johnson |
title |
Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times |
title_short |
Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times |
title_full |
Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times |
title_fullStr |
Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times |
title_full_unstemmed |
Specialization and Performance: Evidence from NCAA 4 × 400 m Relay Times |
title_sort |
specialization and performance: evidence from ncaa 4 × 400 m relay times |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Economies |
issn |
2227-7099 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This paper investigates the impact of having open 400 meter (400 m) runners on NCAA relay teams. Using data from 2012–2016 containing the top 100 4 × 400 m in each NCAA Division relay times for each year, it is found that more 400 m specialists lead to an increase in the overall performance of the team, measured by a decrease in relay times. The effect is examined across Division I–III NCAA track teams. The results are consistent across each division. We view this as a test of the role of specialization on performance. Using runners who specialize in 400 m races should increase overall team performance as long as specialization does not lead to an inefficient allocation of team human capital. An additional performance measure is used examining the difference between projected and actual relay times. Divisions I and II are found to perform better than projected with an increase in 400 m runners, but there is no effect found in Division III. |
topic |
specialization running peer effects Division III |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/4/96 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT candonjohnson specializationandperformanceevidencefromncaa4400mrelaytimes AT robertschultz specializationandperformanceevidencefromncaa4400mrelaytimes AT joshuachall specializationandperformanceevidencefromncaa4400mrelaytimes |
_version_ |
1724435850707599360 |