To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: Use of diathermy has become ubiquitous in majority of surgical specialities for its convenience and advantages with respect to haemostasis and sharps safety. However, its use for incising epidermis and dermis of the skin remains controversial because of the fear of thermal burns, resul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yash Thakkar, Ramesh Dumbre, Arun Fernandes, Deepak Phalgune
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2019-10-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13211/42349_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_OM)_PFA_GC(AaG_SL)_PN(SL).pdf
id doaj-29f804ddba5a4a0387880431a0717317
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29f804ddba5a4a0387880431a07173172020-11-25T02:41:17ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2019-10-011310PC05PC0810.7860/JCDR/2019/42349.13211To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled TrialYash Thakkar0Ramesh Dumbre1Arun Fernandes2Deepak Phalgune3Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Head and Consultant, Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Consultant and Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Research Consultant, Department of Research, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: Use of diathermy has become ubiquitous in majority of surgical specialities for its convenience and advantages with respect to haemostasis and sharps safety. However, its use for incising epidermis and dermis of the skin remains controversial because of the fear of thermal burns, resulting in a scar that is cosmetically inferior to that from the use of a scalpel. Aim: To compare the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy against scalpel for incising skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery. Materials and Methods: Two hundred eighteen patients admitted for elective open abdominal procedures were randomised for skin incision, into scalpel and cutting diathermy group. Postoperative wound pain was measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. At 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, patient’s surgical scars were evaluated by using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Inter-group comparison of categorical and continuous variables was done using chi-square test/Fisher’sexact test and Unpaired t-test respectively. Results: Mean VAS score in scalpel group was significantly higher as compared to diathermy group. Mean total score of POSAS patient scale, mean total and overall score of POSAS observer scale at 1 and 3 months was significantly higher in diathermy group compared to scalpel group. Mean total and overall score of POSAS patient scale and mean total and overall score of POSAS observer scale at 6 months did not differ significantly between two study groups. Conclusion: Cutting diathermy incisions in elective open abdominal procedures had less postoperative pain and better cosmetic outcome in healing as measured by POSAS at one month and 3 months whereas cosmetic outcome was comparable to scalpel incisions at six months follow-up.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13211/42349_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_OM)_PFA_GC(AaG_SL)_PN(SL).pdfcosmesispatient and observer scar assessment scalevisual analogue scale score
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yash Thakkar
Ramesh Dumbre
Arun Fernandes
Deepak Phalgune
spellingShingle Yash Thakkar
Ramesh Dumbre
Arun Fernandes
Deepak Phalgune
To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
cosmesis
patient and observer scar assessment scale
visual analogue scale score
author_facet Yash Thakkar
Ramesh Dumbre
Arun Fernandes
Deepak Phalgune
author_sort Yash Thakkar
title To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed To Compare Cosmetic Outcome using Cutting Diathermy against Scalpel for Incising Skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort to compare cosmetic outcome using cutting diathermy against scalpel for incising skin during elective abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Introduction: Use of diathermy has become ubiquitous in majority of surgical specialities for its convenience and advantages with respect to haemostasis and sharps safety. However, its use for incising epidermis and dermis of the skin remains controversial because of the fear of thermal burns, resulting in a scar that is cosmetically inferior to that from the use of a scalpel. Aim: To compare the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy against scalpel for incising skin during Elective Abdominal Surgery. Materials and Methods: Two hundred eighteen patients admitted for elective open abdominal procedures were randomised for skin incision, into scalpel and cutting diathermy group. Postoperative wound pain was measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. At 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, patient’s surgical scars were evaluated by using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Inter-group comparison of categorical and continuous variables was done using chi-square test/Fisher’sexact test and Unpaired t-test respectively. Results: Mean VAS score in scalpel group was significantly higher as compared to diathermy group. Mean total score of POSAS patient scale, mean total and overall score of POSAS observer scale at 1 and 3 months was significantly higher in diathermy group compared to scalpel group. Mean total and overall score of POSAS patient scale and mean total and overall score of POSAS observer scale at 6 months did not differ significantly between two study groups. Conclusion: Cutting diathermy incisions in elective open abdominal procedures had less postoperative pain and better cosmetic outcome in healing as measured by POSAS at one month and 3 months whereas cosmetic outcome was comparable to scalpel incisions at six months follow-up.
topic cosmesis
patient and observer scar assessment scale
visual analogue scale score
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13211/42349_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_OM)_PFA_GC(AaG_SL)_PN(SL).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yashthakkar tocomparecosmeticoutcomeusingcuttingdiathermyagainstscalpelforincisingskinduringelectiveabdominalsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rameshdumbre tocomparecosmeticoutcomeusingcuttingdiathermyagainstscalpelforincisingskinduringelectiveabdominalsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT arunfernandes tocomparecosmeticoutcomeusingcuttingdiathermyagainstscalpelforincisingskinduringelectiveabdominalsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deepakphalgune tocomparecosmeticoutcomeusingcuttingdiathermyagainstscalpelforincisingskinduringelectiveabdominalsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724779166323179520