Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits

The cerebellum regulates complex movements and is also implicated in cognitive tasks, and cerebellar dysfunction is consequently associated not only with movement disorders, but also with conditions like autism and dyslexia. How information is encoded by specific cerebellar firing patterns remains d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abigail L Person, Indira M Raman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00097/full
id doaj-29f60ee74efa4416a885a6568fc92857
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29f60ee74efa4416a885a6568fc928572020-11-24T22:01:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102012-12-01610.3389/fncir.2012.0009737873Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuitsAbigail L Person0Indira M Raman1University of Colorado School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityThe cerebellum regulates complex movements and is also implicated in cognitive tasks, and cerebellar dysfunction is consequently associated not only with movement disorders, but also with conditions like autism and dyslexia. How information is encoded by specific cerebellar firing patterns remains debated, however. A central question is how the cerebellar cortex transmits its integrated output to the cerebellar nuclei via GABAergic synapses from Purkinje neurons. Possible answers come from accumulating evidence that subsets of Purkinje cells synchronize their firing during behaviors that require the cerebellum. Consistent with models predicting that coherent activity of inhibitory networks has the capacity to dictate firing patterns of target neurons, recent experimental work supports the idea that inhibitory synchrony may regulate the response of cerebellar nuclear cells to Purkinje inputs, owing to the interplay between unusually fast inhibitory synaptic responses and high rates of intrinsic activity. Data from multiple laboratories lead to a working hypothesis that synchronous inhibitory input from Purkinje cells can set the timing and rate of action potentials produced by cerebellar nuclear cells, thereby relaying information out of the cerebellum. If so, then changing spatiotemporal patterns of Purkinje activity would allow different subsets of inhibitory neurons to control cerebellar output at different times. Here we explore the evidence for and against the idea that a synchrony code defines, at least in part, the input-output function between the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. We consider the literature on the existence of simple spike synchrony, convergence of Purkinje neurons onto nuclear neurons, and intrinsic properties of nuclear neurons that contribute to responses to inhibition. Finally, we discuss factors that may disrupt or modulate a synchrony code and describe the potential contributions of inhibitory synchrony to other motor circuits.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00097/fullCerebellar NucleiinhibitionPurkinjeaction potentialspatiotemporalinterpositus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abigail L Person
Indira M Raman
spellingShingle Abigail L Person
Indira M Raman
Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Cerebellar Nuclei
inhibition
Purkinje
action potential
spatiotemporal
interpositus
author_facet Abigail L Person
Indira M Raman
author_sort Abigail L Person
title Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
title_short Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
title_full Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
title_fullStr Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
title_full_unstemmed Synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
title_sort synchrony and neural coding in cerebellar circuits
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neural Circuits
issn 1662-5110
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The cerebellum regulates complex movements and is also implicated in cognitive tasks, and cerebellar dysfunction is consequently associated not only with movement disorders, but also with conditions like autism and dyslexia. How information is encoded by specific cerebellar firing patterns remains debated, however. A central question is how the cerebellar cortex transmits its integrated output to the cerebellar nuclei via GABAergic synapses from Purkinje neurons. Possible answers come from accumulating evidence that subsets of Purkinje cells synchronize their firing during behaviors that require the cerebellum. Consistent with models predicting that coherent activity of inhibitory networks has the capacity to dictate firing patterns of target neurons, recent experimental work supports the idea that inhibitory synchrony may regulate the response of cerebellar nuclear cells to Purkinje inputs, owing to the interplay between unusually fast inhibitory synaptic responses and high rates of intrinsic activity. Data from multiple laboratories lead to a working hypothesis that synchronous inhibitory input from Purkinje cells can set the timing and rate of action potentials produced by cerebellar nuclear cells, thereby relaying information out of the cerebellum. If so, then changing spatiotemporal patterns of Purkinje activity would allow different subsets of inhibitory neurons to control cerebellar output at different times. Here we explore the evidence for and against the idea that a synchrony code defines, at least in part, the input-output function between the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. We consider the literature on the existence of simple spike synchrony, convergence of Purkinje neurons onto nuclear neurons, and intrinsic properties of nuclear neurons that contribute to responses to inhibition. Finally, we discuss factors that may disrupt or modulate a synchrony code and describe the potential contributions of inhibitory synchrony to other motor circuits.
topic Cerebellar Nuclei
inhibition
Purkinje
action potential
spatiotemporal
interpositus
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00097/full
work_keys_str_mv AT abigaillperson synchronyandneuralcodingincerebellarcircuits
AT indiramraman synchronyandneuralcodingincerebellarcircuits
_version_ 1725841661714497536