Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?

This article reviews the progress which has been made in the uses of Learning Technology (LT) to support teaching and learning in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector. It argues that progress in terms of the depth and breadth of overall impact is limited and disappointing, despit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crawley, Jim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Huddersfield Press 2009-01-01
Series:Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1143
id doaj-29cde77753ad4c80b7c04e187a7cbccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29cde77753ad4c80b7c04e187a7cbccf2020-11-25T00:52:38ZengUniversity of Huddersfield PressTeaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice2049-41812040-09932009-01-0111435010.5920/till.2009.1143Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?Crawley, JimThis article reviews the progress which has been made in the uses of Learning Technology (LT) to support teaching and learning in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector. It argues that progress in terms of the depth and breadth of overall impact is limited and disappointing, despite significant investment from government and others. Across the PCET sector as a whole, despite progress in a number of areas, the use of technology is far from embedded in teaching and learning, and little real ‘transformation’ on any major scale has taken place. The possible reasons for this situation are discussed, as is the particular situation of teachers in PCET. The lack of progress is not, it is argued, due to any lack of willingness by staff to experiment and innovate, but to a range of other sector wide issues. The article concludes with some recommendations relating to how this important sector of UK education could move forward to a more positive future in relation to LT.http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1143
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Crawley, Jim
spellingShingle Crawley, Jim
Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
author_facet Crawley, Jim
author_sort Crawley, Jim
title Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
title_short Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
title_full Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
title_fullStr Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
title_full_unstemmed Much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with Learning Technology in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector?
title_sort much technology, but limited impact: what progress has been made with learning technology in the post compulsory education and training (pcet) sector?
publisher University of Huddersfield Press
series Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
issn 2049-4181
2040-0993
publishDate 2009-01-01
description This article reviews the progress which has been made in the uses of Learning Technology (LT) to support teaching and learning in the Post Compulsory Education and Training (PCET) sector. It argues that progress in terms of the depth and breadth of overall impact is limited and disappointing, despite significant investment from government and others. Across the PCET sector as a whole, despite progress in a number of areas, the use of technology is far from embedded in teaching and learning, and little real ‘transformation’ on any major scale has taken place. The possible reasons for this situation are discussed, as is the particular situation of teachers in PCET. The lack of progress is not, it is argued, due to any lack of willingness by staff to experiment and innovate, but to a range of other sector wide issues. The article concludes with some recommendations relating to how this important sector of UK education could move forward to a more positive future in relation to LT.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1143
work_keys_str_mv AT crawleyjim muchtechnologybutlimitedimpactwhatprogresshasbeenmadewithlearningtechnologyinthepostcompulsoryeducationandtrainingpcetsector
_version_ 1725241087755288576