Comparison of Efficacy and Complications of Holmium Laser and Pneumatic Lithotripters Used in the Ureterorenoscopic Treatment of Proximal Ureter Stones, a Multi-Center Study of Society of Urological Surgery Aegean Study Group

• Main Authors: Bora İrer, Volkan Şen, Oğuzcan Erbatu, Alperen Yıldız, Şakir Ongün, Önder Çınar, Ahmet Cihan, Mehmet Şahin, Mehmet Oğuz Şahin, Oktay Üçer, Fuat Kızılay, Ozan Bozkurt
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2018-09-01
• Series: Journal of Urological Surgery
• Subjects: Complication; Laser lithotripter; Pneumatic lithotripter; Proximal ureter stone; Ureter stone
• Online Access: http://jurolsurgery.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-efficacy-and-complications-of-holmiu/19585

Objective:The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and complications of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy used in the ureterorenoscopic treatment of proximal ureteral stones.Materials and Methods:Data of 638 patients, who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS) due to proximal ureteral stones in different centers, were obtained from patient files. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of lithotripter used: group 1; laser lithotripter (n=324; 50.8%) and group 2; pneumatic lithotripter (n=314; 49.2%). URS was considered successful upon determination stone-free status with the imaging methods after treatment. The effectiveness and the complications of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and pneumatic lithotripsy were compared.Results:The total success rate of URS was 82.6% and the complication rate was 8.1%. The mean age of patients was similar between the groups; however, the body mass index values, stone surface area and stone Hounsfield unit were significantly higher in group 1. Although the mean operative time, complication rate and the mean length of hospital stay were similar between the groups; the URS success and postoperative ureteral J stent use rates were significantly higher in group 1 and the push-back rate was significantly higher in group 2.Conclusion:If laser lithotripsy is available in a clinic, we believe that it is better to use it as the first option in the treatment of proximal ureter stones. However, considering that it is not easy to access laser lithotripters due to their high cost in Turkey, pneumatic lithotripters may be an effective and inexpensive alternative that can also be safely used in these cases.