“Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention

The aim of the mixed-methods study reported here was to evaluate the impact of a “gain-framed”, multimedia campaign to encourage heavier drinking men aged 45–64 years to drink less. Quantitative analyses were based on pre-intervention panel surveys of 3057 men in intervention regions and 500 in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Lockwood, Richard de Visser, John Larsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Addictive Behaviors Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853220301218
id doaj-29a1d73928e64b0c90189d9a4ecddc72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29a1d73928e64b0c90189d9a4ecddc722020-12-19T05:08:48ZengElsevierAddictive Behaviors Reports2352-85322020-12-0112100306“Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol interventionNina Lockwood0Richard de Visser1John Larsen2School of Psychology, University of Sussex, UKSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, UK; Corresponding author at: Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer BN1 9PH, UK.Drinkaware Trust, UKThe aim of the mixed-methods study reported here was to evaluate the impact of a “gain-framed”, multimedia campaign to encourage heavier drinking men aged 45–64 years to drink less. Quantitative analyses were based on pre-intervention panel surveys of 3057 men in intervention regions and 500 in the control region, and post-intervention panel surveys of 1508 men in intervention regions and 219 in the control region. Qualitative analyses entailed thematic analysis of interviews with 14 men: five who had reduced their drinking after seeing the campaign, four who had considered reducing but did not, and five who did not consider changing. Interviews focused on men’s responses to the campaign, and their ideas for how to improve it. In quantitative analyses, the campaign was associated with significant changes in alcohol consumption, and significant increases in readiness to change and likelihood of using moderate drinking strategies. In qualitative analyses, men appreciated the friendly, non-threatening tone and that the message was straightforward, meaningful, achievable, and was gain-framed - i.e., emphasised the benefits of drinking less rather than the harms of drinking too much. However, the men who did not change their behaviour also identified several barriers to responding in ways encouraged by the message. It would be important to address their views of their drinking as not problematic, as pleasurable, and as socially expected, and also their sense of not feeling empowered to initiate or maintain behaviour change.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853220301218AlcoholInterventionQualitativePublic health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nina Lockwood
Richard de Visser
John Larsen
spellingShingle Nina Lockwood
Richard de Visser
John Larsen
“Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Alcohol
Intervention
Qualitative
Public health
author_facet Nina Lockwood
Richard de Visser
John Larsen
author_sort Nina Lockwood
title “Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
title_short “Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
title_full “Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
title_fullStr “Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
title_full_unstemmed “Have a little less, feel a lot better”: Mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
title_sort “have a little less, feel a lot better”: mixed-method evaluation of an alcohol intervention
publisher Elsevier
series Addictive Behaviors Reports
issn 2352-8532
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The aim of the mixed-methods study reported here was to evaluate the impact of a “gain-framed”, multimedia campaign to encourage heavier drinking men aged 45–64 years to drink less. Quantitative analyses were based on pre-intervention panel surveys of 3057 men in intervention regions and 500 in the control region, and post-intervention panel surveys of 1508 men in intervention regions and 219 in the control region. Qualitative analyses entailed thematic analysis of interviews with 14 men: five who had reduced their drinking after seeing the campaign, four who had considered reducing but did not, and five who did not consider changing. Interviews focused on men’s responses to the campaign, and their ideas for how to improve it. In quantitative analyses, the campaign was associated with significant changes in alcohol consumption, and significant increases in readiness to change and likelihood of using moderate drinking strategies. In qualitative analyses, men appreciated the friendly, non-threatening tone and that the message was straightforward, meaningful, achievable, and was gain-framed - i.e., emphasised the benefits of drinking less rather than the harms of drinking too much. However, the men who did not change their behaviour also identified several barriers to responding in ways encouraged by the message. It would be important to address their views of their drinking as not problematic, as pleasurable, and as socially expected, and also their sense of not feeling empowered to initiate or maintain behaviour change.
topic Alcohol
Intervention
Qualitative
Public health
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853220301218
work_keys_str_mv AT ninalockwood havealittlelessfeelalotbettermixedmethodevaluationofanalcoholintervention
AT richarddevisser havealittlelessfeelalotbettermixedmethodevaluationofanalcoholintervention
AT johnlarsen havealittlelessfeelalotbettermixedmethodevaluationofanalcoholintervention
_version_ 1724377621946433536