Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016

In the well-known worldview and praxeologic typology of the Ukrainian man, which was held by M. Shlemkevich, the Frankivsk man is absent. At the same time, the researcher does not substantiate his vision of the peculiarities of the religiosity of Ivan Franko. Rather, he proceeded from the identific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anatolii M. Kolodnyi
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ukrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR) 2015-12-01
Series:Українське Pелігієзнавство
Online Access:https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/595
id doaj-2982cd1ce5ff416cb02eba0700aea979
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2982cd1ce5ff416cb02eba0700aea9792020-11-25T00:29:40ZrusUkrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR)Українське Pелігієзнавство2306-35482617-97922015-12-017610.32420/2015.76.595Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016Anatolii M. Kolodnyi In the well-known worldview and praxeologic typology of the Ukrainian man, which was held by M. Shlemkevich, the Frankivsk man is absent. At the same time, the researcher does not substantiate his vision of the peculiarities of the religiosity of Ivan Franko. Rather, he proceeded from the identification of free-thinking with atheism and did not recognize the existence of religious free-thinking among Ukrainians. Meanwhile, it is dominant. The fact is that the Church somehow perceive freedom of religion, freedom of religion, but each of them does not allow itself freedom In religion, freedom In its religion. Any deviation from the dogmas or canons, the arbitrary interpretation of certain provisions of the doctrine, and especially the anti-clericalism, is perceived as heresy, and ultimately qualifies as atheism. That is why Ivan Franko was uncomfortable with the church leadership of the Greek Catholics of Galicia, and the Orthodox enjoyed his works, where he criticized the Vatican, his policy on Slavs. About the work of the thinker, in which they considered worldview problems, did not even speak https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/595
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anatolii M. Kolodnyi
spellingShingle Anatolii M. Kolodnyi
Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
Українське Pелігієзнавство
author_facet Anatolii M. Kolodnyi
author_sort Anatolii M. Kolodnyi
title Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
title_short Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
title_full Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
title_fullStr Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
title_full_unstemmed Religion and Church in the vision of Ivan Franko. To the Frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
title_sort religion and church in the vision of ivan franko. to the frankivsk anniversaries in 2016
publisher Ukrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR)
series Українське Pелігієзнавство
issn 2306-3548
2617-9792
publishDate 2015-12-01
description In the well-known worldview and praxeologic typology of the Ukrainian man, which was held by M. Shlemkevich, the Frankivsk man is absent. At the same time, the researcher does not substantiate his vision of the peculiarities of the religiosity of Ivan Franko. Rather, he proceeded from the identification of free-thinking with atheism and did not recognize the existence of religious free-thinking among Ukrainians. Meanwhile, it is dominant. The fact is that the Church somehow perceive freedom of religion, freedom of religion, but each of them does not allow itself freedom In religion, freedom In its religion. Any deviation from the dogmas or canons, the arbitrary interpretation of certain provisions of the doctrine, and especially the anti-clericalism, is perceived as heresy, and ultimately qualifies as atheism. That is why Ivan Franko was uncomfortable with the church leadership of the Greek Catholics of Galicia, and the Orthodox enjoyed his works, where he criticized the Vatican, his policy on Slavs. About the work of the thinker, in which they considered worldview problems, did not even speak
url https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/595
work_keys_str_mv AT anatoliimkolodnyi religionandchurchinthevisionofivanfrankotothefrankivskanniversariesin2016
_version_ 1725330591202672640