POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?

We may ask ourselves after reading this dense, coherent and reasonably long argumentation in the article “Estruturalfuncionalismoantropológico e comensalidade: brevesconsiderações sobre a mudança social” (Anthropologicalstructural functionalism and commensality: brief reflectionson social change) by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Madel Therezinha Luz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Josely Correa Koury 2013-09-01
Series:Demetra
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/7397
id doaj-29795182f39f4f33822f49e4e5fd630f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29795182f39f4f33822f49e4e5fd630f2021-04-02T20:28:27ZengJosely Correa KouryDemetra2238-913X2013-09-018025726010.12957/demetra.2013.73974355POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?Madel Therezinha LuzWe may ask ourselves after reading this dense, coherent and reasonably long argumentation in the article “Estruturalfuncionalismoantropológico e comensalidade: brevesconsiderações sobre a mudança social” (Anthropologicalstructural functionalism and commensality: brief reflectionson social change) by César Sabino and Maria Cláudia da VeigaSoares de Carvalho, if it still makes sense to talk about thestructural-functionalist approach, in the Social Sciences, asa model, theory, or method of analysis. Especially when readin the works of the founding fathers of anthropology and thevaried methodological and theoretical currents that, in thesecond half of the twentieth century, have been brought forthin anthropology, but also in Sociology, Politics, and finally(after the 1970s), in this extensive disciplinary field known as Social Communication.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/7397
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madel Therezinha Luz
spellingShingle Madel Therezinha Luz
POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
Demetra
author_facet Madel Therezinha Luz
author_sort Madel Therezinha Luz
title POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
title_short POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
title_full POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
title_fullStr POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
title_full_unstemmed POR QUE FALAR DE TEORIA ANTROPOLÓGICA CLÁSSICA NO CAMPO ATUAL DA ALIMENTAÇÃO?
title_sort por que falar de teoria antropológica clássica no campo atual da alimentação?
publisher Josely Correa Koury
series Demetra
issn 2238-913X
publishDate 2013-09-01
description We may ask ourselves after reading this dense, coherent and reasonably long argumentation in the article “Estruturalfuncionalismoantropológico e comensalidade: brevesconsiderações sobre a mudança social” (Anthropologicalstructural functionalism and commensality: brief reflectionson social change) by César Sabino and Maria Cláudia da VeigaSoares de Carvalho, if it still makes sense to talk about thestructural-functionalist approach, in the Social Sciences, asa model, theory, or method of analysis. Especially when readin the works of the founding fathers of anthropology and thevaried methodological and theoretical currents that, in thesecond half of the twentieth century, have been brought forthin anthropology, but also in Sociology, Politics, and finally(after the 1970s), in this extensive disciplinary field known as Social Communication.
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/7397
work_keys_str_mv AT madeltherezinhaluz porquefalardeteoriaantropologicaclassicanocampoatualdaalimentacao
_version_ 1721547094151397376