Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin

During more than a century since its original identification, the Gowganda Formation in Ontario (Canada) has gradually been reinterpreted from representing mainly subglacial tillites to secondary gravity flow and glaciomarine deposits. The main pieces of geological evidence advanced in favour of gla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Molén Mats O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-08-01
Series:Geologos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2021-0009
id doaj-2962977ea8c949c8b28de4268edd6518
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2962977ea8c949c8b28de4268edd65182021-10-03T07:42:47ZengSciendoGeologos2080-65742021-08-01272739110.2478/logos-2021-0009Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in originMolén Mats O.0Umeå FoU, Vallmov. 61, 90352 Umeå, SwedenDuring more than a century since its original identification, the Gowganda Formation in Ontario (Canada) has gradually been reinterpreted from representing mainly subglacial tillites to secondary gravity flow and glaciomarine deposits. The main pieces of geological evidence advanced in favour of glaciation in recent articles are outsized clasts that have been interpreted as dropstones and patches of diamictites in a single small-sized area at Cobalt which is still interpreted as displaying subglacial basal tillites. The present research considers field evidence in the Gowganda Formation in the light of more recent work on gravity flows linked to tectonics. Detailed studies have demonstrated that the clasts which are interpreted to be dropstones rarely penetrate laminae and are commonly draped by sediments the appearance of which is similar to lonestones in gravity flows. The “subglacial area” at Cobalt displays evidence of tectonics and gravity flows, which can be traced from the underlying bedrock, and then further in the overlying sequence of diamictites and rhythmites. The sum of geological features displays appearances at odds with a primary glaciogenic origin, and there is no unequivocal evidence present of glaciation. The data indicate deposition by non-glaciogenic gravity flows, including cohesive debris flows for the more compact units, probably triggered by tectonic displacements.https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2021-0009debris flowlonestone vs dropstonelamination vs varvenon-glacial diamictite vs tillitesnowball earth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Molén Mats O.
spellingShingle Molén Mats O.
Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
Geologos
debris flow
lonestone vs dropstone
lamination vs varve
non-glacial diamictite vs tillite
snowball earth
author_facet Molén Mats O.
author_sort Molén Mats O.
title Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
title_short Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
title_full Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
title_fullStr Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
title_full_unstemmed Field evidence suggests that the Palaeoproterozoic Gowganda Formation in Canada is non-glacial in origin
title_sort field evidence suggests that the palaeoproterozoic gowganda formation in canada is non-glacial in origin
publisher Sciendo
series Geologos
issn 2080-6574
publishDate 2021-08-01
description During more than a century since its original identification, the Gowganda Formation in Ontario (Canada) has gradually been reinterpreted from representing mainly subglacial tillites to secondary gravity flow and glaciomarine deposits. The main pieces of geological evidence advanced in favour of glaciation in recent articles are outsized clasts that have been interpreted as dropstones and patches of diamictites in a single small-sized area at Cobalt which is still interpreted as displaying subglacial basal tillites. The present research considers field evidence in the Gowganda Formation in the light of more recent work on gravity flows linked to tectonics. Detailed studies have demonstrated that the clasts which are interpreted to be dropstones rarely penetrate laminae and are commonly draped by sediments the appearance of which is similar to lonestones in gravity flows. The “subglacial area” at Cobalt displays evidence of tectonics and gravity flows, which can be traced from the underlying bedrock, and then further in the overlying sequence of diamictites and rhythmites. The sum of geological features displays appearances at odds with a primary glaciogenic origin, and there is no unequivocal evidence present of glaciation. The data indicate deposition by non-glaciogenic gravity flows, including cohesive debris flows for the more compact units, probably triggered by tectonic displacements.
topic debris flow
lonestone vs dropstone
lamination vs varve
non-glacial diamictite vs tillite
snowball earth
url https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2021-0009
work_keys_str_mv AT molenmatso fieldevidencesuggeststhatthepalaeoproterozoicgowgandaformationincanadaisnonglacialinorigin
_version_ 1716845715843448832