Evaluation in vivo of biocompatibility of differents resin-modified cements for bonding orthodontic bands

• Main Authors: JANAINA A. MESQUITA, ROGÉRIO LACERDA-SANTOS, GÊISA A.M. SAMPAIO, GUSTAVO P. GODOY, CASSIANO F.W. NONAKA, POLLIANNA M. ALVES
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2017-10-01
• Series: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
• Subjects: Dental materials; orthodontic cements; biocompatibility test; inflammation; multinucleated giant cells
• Online Access: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017005025105&lng=en&tlng=en

ABSTRACT The focus of this study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference between the biocompatibility of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Sixty male Wistar rats were selected and divided into four groups: Control Group; Crosslink Group; RMO Group and Transbond Group. The materials were inserted into rat subcutaneous tissue. After time intervals of 7, 15 and 30 days morphological analyses were performed. The histological parameters assessed were: inflammatory infiltrate intensity; reaction of multinucleated giant cells; edema; necrosis; granulation reaction; young fibroblasts and collagenization. The results obtained were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test (P<0.05). After 7 days, Groups RMO and Transbond showed intense inflammatory infiltrate (P=0.004), only Group RMO presented greater expression of multinucleated giant cell reaction (P=0.003) compared with the control group. After the time intervals of 15 and 30 days, there was evidence of light/moderate inflammatory infiltrate, lower level of multinucleated giant cell reaction and thicker areas of young fibroblasts in all the groups. The hypothesis was rejected. The Crosslink cement provided good tissue response, since it demonstrated a lower level of inflammatory infiltrate and higher degree of collagenization, while RMO demonstrated the lowest level of biocompatibility.