Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
The human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Robotics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474 |
id |
doaj-293f7a8abcec453ebb8c0a29c543f85b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-293f7a8abcec453ebb8c0a29c543f85b2020-11-24T22:20:50ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Robotics1687-96001687-96192016-01-01201610.1155/2016/48024744802474Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of PerformanceRoberta Alò0Francesco Bottiglione1Giacomo Mantriota2Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyDipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyDipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyThe human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery capabilities already available in the literature: the Series Elastic Actuator (SEA), the Clutchable Series Elastic Actuator (C-SEA), and the flywheel Infinitely Variable Transmission (F-IVT) actuator. In this paper, a simulation model based comparison of the performance of these actuators is presented. The focus is on two performance indexes: the energy consumed by the electric motor per gait and the peak torque/power requested to the electric motor. Both quantities are related to the portability of the device: the former affects the size of the batteries for a given desired range; the latter affects the size and the weight of the electric motor. The results show that, besides some well-explained limitations of the presented methodology, the C-SEA is the most energy efficient whereas the F-IVT allows cutting down the motor torque/peak power strongly. The analysis also leads to defining how it is possible to improve the F-IVT to achieve a reduction of the energy consumption.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roberta Alò Francesco Bottiglione Giacomo Mantriota |
spellingShingle |
Roberta Alò Francesco Bottiglione Giacomo Mantriota Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance Journal of Robotics |
author_facet |
Roberta Alò Francesco Bottiglione Giacomo Mantriota |
author_sort |
Roberta Alò |
title |
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance |
title_short |
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance |
title_full |
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance |
title_fullStr |
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance |
title_sort |
artificial knee joints actuators with energy recovery capabilities: a comparison of performance |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Robotics |
issn |
1687-9600 1687-9619 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
The human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery capabilities already available in the literature: the Series Elastic Actuator (SEA), the Clutchable Series Elastic Actuator (C-SEA), and the flywheel Infinitely Variable Transmission (F-IVT) actuator. In this paper, a simulation model based comparison of the performance of these actuators is presented. The focus is on two performance indexes: the energy consumed by the electric motor per gait and the peak torque/power requested to the electric motor. Both quantities are related to the portability of the device: the former affects the size of the batteries for a given desired range; the latter affects the size and the weight of the electric motor. The results show that, besides some well-explained limitations of the presented methodology, the C-SEA is the most energy efficient whereas the F-IVT allows cutting down the motor torque/peak power strongly. The analysis also leads to defining how it is possible to improve the F-IVT to achieve a reduction of the energy consumption. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertaalo artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance AT francescobottiglione artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance AT giacomomantriota artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance |
_version_ |
1725773649710940160 |