Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance

The human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberta Alò, Francesco Bottiglione, Giacomo Mantriota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Robotics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474
id doaj-293f7a8abcec453ebb8c0a29c543f85b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-293f7a8abcec453ebb8c0a29c543f85b2020-11-24T22:20:50ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Robotics1687-96001687-96192016-01-01201610.1155/2016/48024744802474Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of PerformanceRoberta Alò0Francesco Bottiglione1Giacomo Mantriota2Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyDipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyDipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia 182, 70126 Bari, ItalyThe human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery capabilities already available in the literature: the Series Elastic Actuator (SEA), the Clutchable Series Elastic Actuator (C-SEA), and the flywheel Infinitely Variable Transmission (F-IVT) actuator. In this paper, a simulation model based comparison of the performance of these actuators is presented. The focus is on two performance indexes: the energy consumed by the electric motor per gait and the peak torque/power requested to the electric motor. Both quantities are related to the portability of the device: the former affects the size of the batteries for a given desired range; the latter affects the size and the weight of the electric motor. The results show that, besides some well-explained limitations of the presented methodology, the C-SEA is the most energy efficient whereas the F-IVT allows cutting down the motor torque/peak power strongly. The analysis also leads to defining how it is possible to improve the F-IVT to achieve a reduction of the energy consumption.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roberta Alò
Francesco Bottiglione
Giacomo Mantriota
spellingShingle Roberta Alò
Francesco Bottiglione
Giacomo Mantriota
Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
Journal of Robotics
author_facet Roberta Alò
Francesco Bottiglione
Giacomo Mantriota
author_sort Roberta Alò
title Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
title_short Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
title_full Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
title_fullStr Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Knee Joints Actuators with Energy Recovery Capabilities: A Comparison of Performance
title_sort artificial knee joints actuators with energy recovery capabilities: a comparison of performance
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Robotics
issn 1687-9600
1687-9619
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The human knee absorbs more energy than it expends in level ground walking. For this reason it would be useful if the actuation system of a wearable robot for lower limbs was able to recover energy thus improving portability. Presently, we recognize three promising technologies with energy recovery capabilities already available in the literature: the Series Elastic Actuator (SEA), the Clutchable Series Elastic Actuator (C-SEA), and the flywheel Infinitely Variable Transmission (F-IVT) actuator. In this paper, a simulation model based comparison of the performance of these actuators is presented. The focus is on two performance indexes: the energy consumed by the electric motor per gait and the peak torque/power requested to the electric motor. Both quantities are related to the portability of the device: the former affects the size of the batteries for a given desired range; the latter affects the size and the weight of the electric motor. The results show that, besides some well-explained limitations of the presented methodology, the C-SEA is the most energy efficient whereas the F-IVT allows cutting down the motor torque/peak power strongly. The analysis also leads to defining how it is possible to improve the F-IVT to achieve a reduction of the energy consumption.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802474
work_keys_str_mv AT robertaalo artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance
AT francescobottiglione artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance
AT giacomomantriota artificialkneejointsactuatorswithenergyrecoverycapabilitiesacomparisonofperformance
_version_ 1725773649710940160