Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?

The subject of this paper is the analysis of the classification of economic systems. The traditional classifications of capitalist, socialist centrally planned, and socialist market systems, and the newer classification of variants of capitalism into the Anglo-Saxon, European continental, and Asian...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vujačić Ivan, Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-12-01
Series:Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business
Subjects:
d72
p16
p50
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2020-0023
id doaj-2930fdbb684349ab86fd684e88e79c84
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2930fdbb684349ab86fd684e88e79c842021-09-05T21:25:41ZengSciendoZagreb International Review of Economics and Business1849-11622020-12-0123s1577110.2478/zireb-2020-0023Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?Vujačić Ivan0Petrović-Vujačić Jelica1Faculty of Economics, University of Beograd, SerbiaFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Beograd, SerbiaThe subject of this paper is the analysis of the classification of economic systems. The traditional classifications of capitalist, socialist centrally planned, and socialist market systems, and the newer classification of variants of capitalism into the Anglo-Saxon, European continental, and Asian models, are inadequate to explain new phenomena in a globalized economy. After the collapse of central planning, countries in transition became a category describing processes of deep socio-economic transformation. These transition countries aspired to meet the standards of developed European market economies, as well as governance standards regarding democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. A new classification of economic systems by Balcerowicz (2014) combines the traditional classification of economic systems with the characteristics of well-governed democratic societies in order to come up with a matrix that shows the interaction of economic system characteristics and governance outcomes.This paper builds on Balcerowicz’s classification by introducing and delineating the categories of state capitalism, crony capitalism, and state capture in order to provide a new classification of economic systems. It uses these concepts to empirically analyze the transition countries, with special reference to states aspiring to EU membership and the new EU member states. The methodology used is analytical and empirical. The results find that the transition is incomplete, especially in terms of governance, leading to the hypothesis of a ‘mid-transition trap’, similar to the much discussed ‘middle-income trap’. The results should lead to further, more refined research.https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2020-0023economic systemstransitionnew state capitalismcrony capitalismstate captured72p16p50
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
spellingShingle Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business
economic systems
transition
new state capitalism
crony capitalism
state capture
d72
p16
p50
author_facet Vujačić Ivan
Petrović-Vujačić Jelica
author_sort Vujačić Ivan
title Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
title_short Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
title_full Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
title_fullStr Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
title_full_unstemmed Incomplete Transition – Is there a “Mid-Transition Trap”?
title_sort incomplete transition – is there a “mid-transition trap”?
publisher Sciendo
series Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business
issn 1849-1162
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The subject of this paper is the analysis of the classification of economic systems. The traditional classifications of capitalist, socialist centrally planned, and socialist market systems, and the newer classification of variants of capitalism into the Anglo-Saxon, European continental, and Asian models, are inadequate to explain new phenomena in a globalized economy. After the collapse of central planning, countries in transition became a category describing processes of deep socio-economic transformation. These transition countries aspired to meet the standards of developed European market economies, as well as governance standards regarding democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. A new classification of economic systems by Balcerowicz (2014) combines the traditional classification of economic systems with the characteristics of well-governed democratic societies in order to come up with a matrix that shows the interaction of economic system characteristics and governance outcomes.This paper builds on Balcerowicz’s classification by introducing and delineating the categories of state capitalism, crony capitalism, and state capture in order to provide a new classification of economic systems. It uses these concepts to empirically analyze the transition countries, with special reference to states aspiring to EU membership and the new EU member states. The methodology used is analytical and empirical. The results find that the transition is incomplete, especially in terms of governance, leading to the hypothesis of a ‘mid-transition trap’, similar to the much discussed ‘middle-income trap’. The results should lead to further, more refined research.
topic economic systems
transition
new state capitalism
crony capitalism
state capture
d72
p16
p50
url https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2020-0023
work_keys_str_mv AT vujacicivan incompletetransitionisthereamidtransitiontrap
AT petrovicvujacicjelica incompletetransitionisthereamidtransitiontrap
_version_ 1717780342834724864