Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?

Migrant workers may experience higher burdens of occupational injury and illness compared to native-born workers, which may be due to the differential exposure to occupational hazards, differential vulnerability to exposure-associated health impacts, or both. This study aims to assess if the relatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaomin Liu, Steven J Bowe, Lin Li, Lay San Too, Anthony D LaMontagne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242906
id doaj-29234f5b92a64dda94eff76868874b41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29234f5b92a64dda94eff76868874b412021-03-04T12:29:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024290610.1371/journal.pone.0242906Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?Xiaomin LiuSteven J BoweLin LiLay San TooAnthony D LaMontagneMigrant workers may experience higher burdens of occupational injury and illness compared to native-born workers, which may be due to the differential exposure to occupational hazards, differential vulnerability to exposure-associated health impacts, or both. This study aims to assess if the relationships between psychosocial job characteristics and mental health vary by migrant status in Australia (differential vulnerability). A total of 8969 persons from wave 14 (2014-2015) of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey were included in the analysis. Psychosocial job characteristics included skill discretion, decision authority and job insecurity. Mental health was assessed via a Mental Health Inventory-5 score (MHI-5), with a higher score indicating better mental health. Migrant status was defined by (i) country of birth (COB), (ii) the combination of COB and English/Non-English dominant language of COB and (iii) the combination of COB and years since arrival in Australia. Data were analysed using linear regression, adjusting for gender, age and educational attainment. Migrant status was analysed as an effect modifier of the relationships between psychosocial job characteristics and mental health. Skill discretion and decision authority were positively associated with the MHI-5 score while job insecurity was negatively associated with the MHI-5 score. We found no statistical evidence of migrant status acting as an effect modifier of the psychosocial job characteristic-MHI-5 relationships. With respect to psychosocial job characteristic-mental health relationships, these results suggest that differential exposure to job stressors is a more important mechanism than differential vulnerability for generating occupational health inequities between migrants and native-born workers in Australia.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242906
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaomin Liu
Steven J Bowe
Lin Li
Lay San Too
Anthony D LaMontagne
spellingShingle Xiaomin Liu
Steven J Bowe
Lin Li
Lay San Too
Anthony D LaMontagne
Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Xiaomin Liu
Steven J Bowe
Lin Li
Lay San Too
Anthony D LaMontagne
author_sort Xiaomin Liu
title Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
title_short Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
title_full Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
title_fullStr Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: Do associations differ by migrant status in an Australian working population sample?
title_sort psychosocial job characteristics and mental health: do associations differ by migrant status in an australian working population sample?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Migrant workers may experience higher burdens of occupational injury and illness compared to native-born workers, which may be due to the differential exposure to occupational hazards, differential vulnerability to exposure-associated health impacts, or both. This study aims to assess if the relationships between psychosocial job characteristics and mental health vary by migrant status in Australia (differential vulnerability). A total of 8969 persons from wave 14 (2014-2015) of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey were included in the analysis. Psychosocial job characteristics included skill discretion, decision authority and job insecurity. Mental health was assessed via a Mental Health Inventory-5 score (MHI-5), with a higher score indicating better mental health. Migrant status was defined by (i) country of birth (COB), (ii) the combination of COB and English/Non-English dominant language of COB and (iii) the combination of COB and years since arrival in Australia. Data were analysed using linear regression, adjusting for gender, age and educational attainment. Migrant status was analysed as an effect modifier of the relationships between psychosocial job characteristics and mental health. Skill discretion and decision authority were positively associated with the MHI-5 score while job insecurity was negatively associated with the MHI-5 score. We found no statistical evidence of migrant status acting as an effect modifier of the psychosocial job characteristic-MHI-5 relationships. With respect to psychosocial job characteristic-mental health relationships, these results suggest that differential exposure to job stressors is a more important mechanism than differential vulnerability for generating occupational health inequities between migrants and native-born workers in Australia.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242906
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaominliu psychosocialjobcharacteristicsandmentalhealthdoassociationsdifferbymigrantstatusinanaustralianworkingpopulationsample
AT stevenjbowe psychosocialjobcharacteristicsandmentalhealthdoassociationsdifferbymigrantstatusinanaustralianworkingpopulationsample
AT linli psychosocialjobcharacteristicsandmentalhealthdoassociationsdifferbymigrantstatusinanaustralianworkingpopulationsample
AT laysantoo psychosocialjobcharacteristicsandmentalhealthdoassociationsdifferbymigrantstatusinanaustralianworkingpopulationsample
AT anthonydlamontagne psychosocialjobcharacteristicsandmentalhealthdoassociationsdifferbymigrantstatusinanaustralianworkingpopulationsample
_version_ 1714802474920968192