Zero nouns with and without objects
One of the main topics on the study of the relationship between syntax and morphology is (deverbal) nominalizations. In this area, several generalizations that tie the morphological make-up with the syntactic structure have been made. Most relevantly, it has been argued that only overt nominalizatio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics |
Online Access: | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/2288 |
id |
doaj-29075a36f2e444c9a205b800326c5d3e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-29075a36f2e444c9a205b800326c5d3e2020-11-25T00:26:00ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingNordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics1503-85992012-05-0139110.7557/12.22882132Zero nouns with and without objectsAntonio Fábregas0University of Tromsø, NorwayOne of the main topics on the study of the relationship between syntax and morphology is (deverbal) nominalizations. In this area, several generalizations that tie the morphological make-up with the syntactic structure have been made. Most relevantly, it has been argued that only overt nominalizations (those that include a nominalizer like -ation or ‑ment) are allowed to have internal arguments introduced in their structural representation. In this paper, we address some previously unexplained apparent counterexamples to this generalization, and we argue that they can be captured if particular restrictions on the spell out of the syntactic structure are taken into consideration.https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/2288 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Antonio Fábregas |
spellingShingle |
Antonio Fábregas Zero nouns with and without objects Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics |
author_facet |
Antonio Fábregas |
author_sort |
Antonio Fábregas |
title |
Zero nouns with and without objects |
title_short |
Zero nouns with and without objects |
title_full |
Zero nouns with and without objects |
title_fullStr |
Zero nouns with and without objects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Zero nouns with and without objects |
title_sort |
zero nouns with and without objects |
publisher |
Septentrio Academic Publishing |
series |
Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics |
issn |
1503-8599 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
One of the main topics on the study of the relationship between syntax and morphology is (deverbal) nominalizations. In this area, several generalizations that tie the morphological make-up with the syntactic structure have been made. Most relevantly, it has been argued that only overt nominalizations (those that include a nominalizer like -ation or ‑ment) are allowed to have internal arguments introduced in their structural representation. In this paper, we address some previously unexplained apparent counterexamples to this generalization, and we argue that they can be captured if particular restrictions on the spell out of the syntactic structure are taken into consideration. |
url |
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/2288 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT antoniofabregas zeronounswithandwithoutobjects |
_version_ |
1725346500793335808 |