Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology
Generic qualitative research studies are those that refuse to claim allegiance to a single established methodology. There has been significant debate in the qualitative literature regarding the extent to which rigour can be preserved outside of the guidelines of an established methodology. This arti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2014-02-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119 |
id |
doaj-2903f9a545154d84abb79e70aa9a6ad6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2903f9a545154d84abb79e70aa9a6ad62020-11-25T03:24:26ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692014-02-011310.1177/16094069140130011910.1177_160940691401300119Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological MixologyRenate M. Kahlke BA Hon, MAGeneric qualitative research studies are those that refuse to claim allegiance to a single established methodology. There has been significant debate in the qualitative literature regarding the extent to which rigour can be preserved outside of the guidelines of an established methodology. This article offers a starting place for researchers interested in entering the literature on generic qualitative approaches and offers some guidance to help researchers appreciate the advantages of using a generic approach and navigate the potential pitfalls. Given that generic approaches are, by definition, less defined and established, this article begins by defining generic qualitative approaches, including the descriptive qualitative approach and interpretive description subcategories. It then outlines key critiques of generic studies present in the literature, describes the benefits of generic approaches, and suggests ways in which the issues raised in critiques might be mediated.https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Renate M. Kahlke BA Hon, MA |
spellingShingle |
Renate M. Kahlke BA Hon, MA Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
author_facet |
Renate M. Kahlke BA Hon, MA |
author_sort |
Renate M. Kahlke BA Hon, MA |
title |
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology |
title_short |
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology |
title_full |
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology |
title_fullStr |
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology |
title_sort |
generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
issn |
1609-4069 |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
Generic qualitative research studies are those that refuse to claim allegiance to a single established methodology. There has been significant debate in the qualitative literature regarding the extent to which rigour can be preserved outside of the guidelines of an established methodology. This article offers a starting place for researchers interested in entering the literature on generic qualitative approaches and offers some guidance to help researchers appreciate the advantages of using a generic approach and navigate the potential pitfalls. Given that generic approaches are, by definition, less defined and established, this article begins by defining generic qualitative approaches, including the descriptive qualitative approach and interpretive description subcategories. It then outlines key critiques of generic studies present in the literature, describes the benefits of generic approaches, and suggests ways in which the issues raised in critiques might be mediated. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT renatemkahlkebahonma genericqualitativeapproachespitfallsandbenefitsofmethodologicalmixology |
_version_ |
1724601530890321920 |