Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament
This article investigates the patterns of parliamentary change observed in Myanmar since a constitutionally sanctioned, partially elected legislature was revived in January 2011. In particular, it poses the question as to whether processes of legislative institutionalisation have taken place in the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419892422 |
id |
doaj-28fd9f32dcf2439ebb67ca9892fcbe64 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28fd9f32dcf2439ebb67ca9892fcbe642020-11-25T03:52:02ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822019-12-013810.1177/1868103419892422Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s ParliamentRenaud EgreteauThis article investigates the patterns of parliamentary change observed in Myanmar since a constitutionally sanctioned, partially elected legislature was revived in January 2011. In particular, it poses the question as to whether processes of legislative institutionalisation have taken place in the course of the 2010s. Grounded on ethnographic work carried out between 2013 and 2018 in Myanmar’s Union parliament, established in Naypyitaw, the article explores how in the two post-junta legislatures elected in 2010 and 2015 a number of institutional legacies and parliamentary procedures and functions have been both reintroduced and also reappropriated. The findings point to emerging patterns of routinisation of some legislative tasks and duties performed by neophyte lawmakers and parliamentary staff alike. It is argued that, despite persistent capacity and efficiency problems, and a continuing dominance of the executive and the armed forces in the post-junta context, a parliamentary culture has re-emerged in Myanmar. The article concludes by drawing attention to how a process of legislative institutionalisation has been developed, albeit cursorily.https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419892422 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Renaud Egreteau |
spellingShingle |
Renaud Egreteau Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
author_facet |
Renaud Egreteau |
author_sort |
Renaud Egreteau |
title |
Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament |
title_short |
Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament |
title_full |
Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament |
title_fullStr |
Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards Legislative Institutionalisation? Emerging Patterns of Routinisation in Myanmar’s Parliament |
title_sort |
towards legislative institutionalisation? emerging patterns of routinisation in myanmar’s parliament |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
issn |
1868-1034 1868-4882 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
This article investigates the patterns of parliamentary change observed in Myanmar since a constitutionally sanctioned, partially elected legislature was revived in January 2011. In particular, it poses the question as to whether processes of legislative institutionalisation have taken place in the course of the 2010s. Grounded on ethnographic work carried out between 2013 and 2018 in Myanmar’s Union parliament, established in Naypyitaw, the article explores how in the two post-junta legislatures elected in 2010 and 2015 a number of institutional legacies and parliamentary procedures and functions have been both reintroduced and also reappropriated. The findings point to emerging patterns of routinisation of some legislative tasks and duties performed by neophyte lawmakers and parliamentary staff alike. It is argued that, despite persistent capacity and efficiency problems, and a continuing dominance of the executive and the armed forces in the post-junta context, a parliamentary culture has re-emerged in Myanmar. The article concludes by drawing attention to how a process of legislative institutionalisation has been developed, albeit cursorily. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419892422 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT renaudegreteau towardslegislativeinstitutionalisationemergingpatternsofroutinisationinmyanmarsparliament |
_version_ |
1724484709402017792 |