Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]

Background: Medical educators have the potential to play an important role in addressing resilience issues across the medical education continuum. Yet, limited research has explored this cohort, particularly in the UK context. This study aims to address this gap by exploring resilience and the facto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda Chan, Ashley Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) 2019-08-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2545
id doaj-28eb200c94144e83a960de54a9b20d94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28eb200c94144e83a960de54a9b20d942020-11-25T02:45:42ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962019-08-0181Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]Linda Chan0Ashley Dennis1In His Image Family Medicine ResidencyBillings ClinicBackground: Medical educators have the potential to play an important role in addressing resilience issues across the medical education continuum. Yet, limited research has explored this cohort, particularly in the UK context. This study aims to address this gap by exploring resilience and the factors that relate to resilience in UK medical educators. Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was employed. It contained the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC-25) and the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8), for determining medical educator resilience and depression levels respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics were also collected to identify potential factors associated with resilience. Finally, participants identified factors that facilitated or undermined their resilience through open-ended questions. Data were analysed using quantitative (e.g. multiple regression analysis), and qualitative (i.e. thematic framework analysis) approaches. Results: Among 244 UK participants, the mean CD-RISC-25 score was 72.9 and standard deviation 10.3. The PHQ-8 score was the only significant negative predictor identified (B = -1.22, p < 0.001). Other sociodemographic variables examined were not found to be predictors of CD-RISC-25 scores. Educators identified multidimensional factors influencing their resilience, but predominately viewed internal factors as being supportive, and external factors as undermining. Conclusions: Medical educators in this study had resilience levels that were comparable to other population samples. The study also highlights the importance of considering external factors, such as contextual and sociocultural influences, in addition to individual factors when addressing resilience. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2545Resiliencemedical educatorslearnersdepressioncontextualsociocultural.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linda Chan
Ashley Dennis
spellingShingle Linda Chan
Ashley Dennis
Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
MedEdPublish
Resilience
medical educators
learners
depression
contextual
sociocultural.
author_facet Linda Chan
Ashley Dennis
author_sort Linda Chan
title Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
title_short Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
title_full Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
title_fullStr Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
title_full_unstemmed Resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [Version 2]
title_sort resilience: a nationwide study of medical educators [version 2]
publisher Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
series MedEdPublish
issn 2312-7996
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Background: Medical educators have the potential to play an important role in addressing resilience issues across the medical education continuum. Yet, limited research has explored this cohort, particularly in the UK context. This study aims to address this gap by exploring resilience and the factors that relate to resilience in UK medical educators. Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was employed. It contained the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC-25) and the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8), for determining medical educator resilience and depression levels respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics were also collected to identify potential factors associated with resilience. Finally, participants identified factors that facilitated or undermined their resilience through open-ended questions. Data were analysed using quantitative (e.g. multiple regression analysis), and qualitative (i.e. thematic framework analysis) approaches. Results: Among 244 UK participants, the mean CD-RISC-25 score was 72.9 and standard deviation 10.3. The PHQ-8 score was the only significant negative predictor identified (B = -1.22, p < 0.001). Other sociodemographic variables examined were not found to be predictors of CD-RISC-25 scores. Educators identified multidimensional factors influencing their resilience, but predominately viewed internal factors as being supportive, and external factors as undermining. Conclusions: Medical educators in this study had resilience levels that were comparable to other population samples. The study also highlights the importance of considering external factors, such as contextual and sociocultural influences, in addition to individual factors when addressing resilience.
topic Resilience
medical educators
learners
depression
contextual
sociocultural.
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2545
work_keys_str_mv AT lindachan resilienceanationwidestudyofmedicaleducatorsversion2
AT ashleydennis resilienceanationwidestudyofmedicaleducatorsversion2
_version_ 1724760929845903360