Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a Sou...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Health and Medical Publishing Group
2014-11-01
|
Series: | South African Journal of Bioethics and Law |
Online Access: | http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352 |
id |
doaj-28e994b8367a4bb4985e699ed5d7a56b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28e994b8367a4bb4985e699ed5d7a56b2020-11-24T21:34:01ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouth African Journal of Bioethics and Law1999-76392014-11-0172444610.7196/SAJBL.317Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South AfricaDavid McQuoid-MasonIn the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a South African court would have issued a similar order but for different reasons. The answer is probably yes because in this country a foetus has not legal rights until it is born. Unlawfully subjecting a dead pregnant women to ‘life support’ measures to keep a foetus alive, where the deceased has not made a will to that effect, and against the wishes of the family, may result in a criminal charge of a violating a corpse.  http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David McQuoid-Mason |
spellingShingle |
David McQuoid-Mason Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa South African Journal of Bioethics and Law |
author_facet |
David McQuoid-Mason |
author_sort |
David McQuoid-Mason |
title |
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa |
title_short |
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa |
title_full |
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa |
title_sort |
terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: does a fetus have a right to life the law in south africa |
publisher |
Health and Medical Publishing Group |
series |
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law |
issn |
1999-7639 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a South African court would have issued a similar order but for different reasons. The answer is probably yes because in this country a foetus has not legal rights until it is born. Unlawfully subjecting a dead pregnant women to ‘life support’ measures to keep a foetus alive, where the deceased has not made a will to that effect, and against the wishes of the family, may result in a criminal charge of a violating a corpse.  |
url |
http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidmcquoidmason terminatingthepregnancyofabraindeadmotherdoesafetushavearighttolifethelawinsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1725950753393082368 |