Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa

In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a Sou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David McQuoid-Mason
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Health and Medical Publishing Group 2014-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
Online Access:http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352
id doaj-28e994b8367a4bb4985e699ed5d7a56b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28e994b8367a4bb4985e699ed5d7a56b2020-11-24T21:34:01ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouth African Journal of Bioethics and Law1999-76392014-11-0172444610.7196/SAJBL.317Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South AfricaDavid McQuoid-MasonIn the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a South African court would have issued a similar order but for different reasons. The answer is probably yes because in this country a foetus has not legal rights until it is born. Unlawfully subjecting a dead pregnant women to ‘life support’ measures to keep a foetus alive, where the deceased has not made a will to that effect, and against the wishes of the family, may result in a criminal charge of a violating a corpse.  http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David McQuoid-Mason
spellingShingle David McQuoid-Mason
Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
author_facet David McQuoid-Mason
author_sort David McQuoid-Mason
title Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
title_short Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
title_full Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
title_fullStr Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa
title_sort terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: does a fetus have a right to life the law in south africa
publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group
series South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
issn 1999-7639
publishDate 2014-11-01
description In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a South African court would have issued a similar order but for different reasons. The answer is probably yes because in this country a foetus has not legal rights until it is born. Unlawfully subjecting a dead pregnant women to ‘life support’ measures to keep a foetus alive, where the deceased has not made a will to that effect, and against the wishes of the family, may result in a criminal charge of a violating a corpse.  
url http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmcquoidmason terminatingthepregnancyofabraindeadmotherdoesafetushavearighttolifethelawinsouthafrica
_version_ 1725950753393082368