Terminating the pregnancy of a braindead mother: Does a fetus have a right to life The law in South Africa

In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a Sou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David McQuoid-Mason
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Health and Medical Publishing Group 2014-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
Online Access:http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/download/317/352
Description
Summary:In the recent Texas case of Munoz v John Peter Smith Hospital, a husband obtained a court order for the removal of life support from his brain dead pregnant wife whose body was decaying, after a hospital tried to keep her on ‘life support’ until the foetus was born. The question is whether a South African court would have issued a similar order but for different reasons. The answer is probably yes because in this country a foetus has not legal rights until it is born. Unlawfully subjecting a dead pregnant women to ‘life support’ measures to keep a foetus alive, where the deceased has not made a will to that effect, and against the wishes of the family, may result in a criminal charge of a violating a corpse.  
ISSN:1999-7639