Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range

Whether the mesophyll conductance to CO2 movement (gm) within leaves of C3 plants changes with CO2 concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO2 concentrations. We tested for changes in gm over the range of sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations (Ci) for which Rubisco activity limited p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Bunce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/7/3/62
id doaj-28e82ebd0a88493b9b80cef37161c075
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28e82ebd0a88493b9b80cef37161c0752020-11-25T01:13:38ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472018-08-01736210.3390/plants7030062plants7030062Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci RangeJames Bunce0Adaptive Cropping Systems Lab and PP Systems, USDA-ARS, Haverhill, MA 01913, USAWhether the mesophyll conductance to CO2 movement (gm) within leaves of C3 plants changes with CO2 concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO2 concentrations. We tested for changes in gm over the range of sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations (Ci) for which Rubisco activity limited photosynthesis (A) in three plant species grown under the same conditions. Mesophyll conductance was estimated by three independent methods: the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis, variable J fluorescence combined with gas exchange, and the curvature of the Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curve. The latter assay used a new method of rapidly obtaining data points at approximately every 3 μmol mol−1 for Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curves, allowing separate estimates of curvature over limited Ci ranges. In two species, soybean and sunflower, no change in gm with Ci was detected using any of the three methods of estimating gm. In common bean measured under the same conditions as the other species, all three methods indicated large decreases in gm with increasing Ci. Therefore, change in gm with Ci in the Rubsico-limited region of A vs. Ci curves depended on the species, but not on the method of estimating gm.http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/7/3/62photosynthesisstomatal conductanceinternal CO2 concentrationchlorophyll fluorescencemesophyll conductance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Bunce
spellingShingle James Bunce
Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
Plants
photosynthesis
stomatal conductance
internal CO2 concentration
chlorophyll fluorescence
mesophyll conductance
author_facet James Bunce
author_sort James Bunce
title Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
title_short Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
title_full Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
title_fullStr Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
title_full_unstemmed Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO2 Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range
title_sort three methods of estimating mesophyll conductance agree regarding its co2 sensitivity in the rubisco-limited ci range
publisher MDPI AG
series Plants
issn 2223-7747
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Whether the mesophyll conductance to CO2 movement (gm) within leaves of C3 plants changes with CO2 concentration remains a matter of debate, particularly at low CO2 concentrations. We tested for changes in gm over the range of sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations (Ci) for which Rubisco activity limited photosynthesis (A) in three plant species grown under the same conditions. Mesophyll conductance was estimated by three independent methods: the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis, variable J fluorescence combined with gas exchange, and the curvature of the Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curve. The latter assay used a new method of rapidly obtaining data points at approximately every 3 μmol mol−1 for Rubisco-limited A vs. Ci curves, allowing separate estimates of curvature over limited Ci ranges. In two species, soybean and sunflower, no change in gm with Ci was detected using any of the three methods of estimating gm. In common bean measured under the same conditions as the other species, all three methods indicated large decreases in gm with increasing Ci. Therefore, change in gm with Ci in the Rubsico-limited region of A vs. Ci curves depended on the species, but not on the method of estimating gm.
topic photosynthesis
stomatal conductance
internal CO2 concentration
chlorophyll fluorescence
mesophyll conductance
url http://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/7/3/62
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesbunce threemethodsofestimatingmesophyllconductanceagreeregardingitsco2sensitivityintherubiscolimitedcirange
_version_ 1725161071692480512