Prevalence and Distribution of Developmental Defects of Enamel in the Primary Dentition of IVF Children of West Bengal

Introduction: Developmental defects of the enamel (D.D.E.) are changes in the deciduous dentition may lead to aesthetic problems, dental sensitivity and may be predictors of dental caries. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of D.D.E. in the deciduous dentition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sudipta Kar, Subrata Sarkar, Ananya Mukherjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-07-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4639/8725_CE(Ra1)_F(H)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PFA2(P)_PF2(PAG)_PF2(PN).pdf
Description
Summary:Introduction: Developmental defects of the enamel (D.D.E.) are changes in the deciduous dentition may lead to aesthetic problems, dental sensitivity and may be predictors of dental caries. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of D.D.E. in the deciduous dentition of IVF children of West Bengal. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 153 IVF children aged three to five enrolled in institute of reproductive medicine Kolkata, West Bengal, India. One hundred fifty three spontaneously conceived matched controlled children also examined as control group. All of the teeth were examined and the enamel defects were assessed according to the Modified D.D.E Index. The differences were tested for statistical significance by using the Chi-Square test & z-test. Results: The prevalence of D.D.E. was 7.18% in IVF Children and 8.49% in spontaneously conceived children. Diffuse opacities was the common defect found (2.61%) in both group. The most affected teeth were the deciduous maxillary central incisors (12.82% and 13.63% found in IVF and spontaneously conceived group respectively). Defects were observed more frequently in the maxillary arch than in mandibular arch in both groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference found in IVF & spontaneously conceived children group.
ISSN:2249-782X
0973-709X