Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Usi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2021-07-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874 |
id |
doaj-28e480c6389c4e24b79001b6060d868a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28e480c6389c4e24b79001b6060d868a2021-07-28T13:42:28ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-07-011010.7554/eLife.60874Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision makingAzadeh HajiHosseini0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-6527Cendri A Hutcherson1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-4809Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada; Department of Marketing, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaHow does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA.https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874decision makingcognitive self regulationbrain oscillationsdrift diffusion models |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Azadeh HajiHosseini Cendri A Hutcherson |
spellingShingle |
Azadeh HajiHosseini Cendri A Hutcherson Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making eLife decision making cognitive self regulation brain oscillations drift diffusion models |
author_facet |
Azadeh HajiHosseini Cendri A Hutcherson |
author_sort |
Azadeh HajiHosseini |
title |
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
title_short |
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
title_full |
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
title_fullStr |
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
title_sort |
alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making |
publisher |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
series |
eLife |
issn |
2050-084X |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA. |
topic |
decision making cognitive self regulation brain oscillations drift diffusion models |
url |
https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT azadehhajihosseini alphaoscillationsandeventrelatedpotentialsreflectdistinctdynamicsofattributeconstructionandevidenceaccumulationindietarydecisionmaking AT cendriahutcherson alphaoscillationsandeventrelatedpotentialsreflectdistinctdynamicsofattributeconstructionandevidenceaccumulationindietarydecisionmaking |
_version_ |
1721272415650054144 |