Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making

How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azadeh HajiHosseini, Cendri A Hutcherson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021-07-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874
id doaj-28e480c6389c4e24b79001b6060d868a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28e480c6389c4e24b79001b6060d868a2021-07-28T13:42:28ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-07-011010.7554/eLife.60874Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision makingAzadeh HajiHosseini0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-6527Cendri A Hutcherson1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-4809Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada; Department of Marketing, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaHow does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA.https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874decision makingcognitive self regulationbrain oscillationsdrift diffusion models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Azadeh HajiHosseini
Cendri A Hutcherson
spellingShingle Azadeh HajiHosseini
Cendri A Hutcherson
Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
eLife
decision making
cognitive self regulation
brain oscillations
drift diffusion models
author_facet Azadeh HajiHosseini
Cendri A Hutcherson
author_sort Azadeh HajiHosseini
title Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
title_short Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
title_full Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
title_fullStr Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
title_full_unstemmed Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
title_sort alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA.
topic decision making
cognitive self regulation
brain oscillations
drift diffusion models
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/60874
work_keys_str_mv AT azadehhajihosseini alphaoscillationsandeventrelatedpotentialsreflectdistinctdynamicsofattributeconstructionandevidenceaccumulationindietarydecisionmaking
AT cendriahutcherson alphaoscillationsandeventrelatedpotentialsreflectdistinctdynamicsofattributeconstructionandevidenceaccumulationindietarydecisionmaking
_version_ 1721272415650054144