Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.

OBJECTIVE:To describe how small animal anaesthesia is performed in French-speaking Eastern Canada, and the variations between practices, in particular based on practice type, veterinarian gender and experience. DESIGN:Observational study, survey. SAMPLE:156 respondents. PROCEDURE:A questionnaire was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geoffrey Truchetti, Colombe Otis, Anne-Claire Brisville, Guy Beauchamp, Daniel Pang, Eric Troncy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227204
id doaj-28ccebffc7fc4eafa0b424fcf2bc4b4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28ccebffc7fc4eafa0b424fcf2bc4b4e2021-03-03T21:24:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022720410.1371/journal.pone.0227204Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.Geoffrey TruchettiColombe OtisAnne-Claire BrisvilleGuy BeauchampDaniel PangEric TroncyOBJECTIVE:To describe how small animal anaesthesia is performed in French-speaking Eastern Canada, and the variations between practices, in particular based on practice type, veterinarian gender and experience. DESIGN:Observational study, survey. SAMPLE:156 respondents. PROCEDURE:A questionnaire was designed to assess current small animal anaesthesia practices in French-speaking Eastern Canada, mainly in the province of Quebec. The questionnaire was available through SurveyMonkey, and consisted of four parts: demographic information about the veterinarians surveyed, evaluation and management of anaesthetic risk, anaesthesia procedure, monitoring and safety. Gender, year of graduation, and type of practice were tested as potential risk factors. Chi-square exact test was used to study relations between each risk factor, and the effect of the selected risk factor on each response of the survey. For ordinal data, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to maximize power. RESULTS:Response rate over a period of 3 months was 20.85% (156 respondents). Overall, the way anaesthesia is performed by most respondents does not meet international guidelines, such as patient preparation and evaluation prior to anaesthesia, not using individualised protocols (for 41%), not obtaining intravenous access (12.4% use it for all their anaesthesia in cats, and 30.6% in dogs), lack of patient monitoring at certain intervals for 55% of the responses, and client prompted optional analgesia (for 29% of respondents). Some practices are more compliant than others. Among them, referral centres generally offer better care than general practices. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:The level of care in anaesthesia and analgesia in practices in French-speaking Eastern Canada is concerning, highlighting the need for more sustained continuing education.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227204
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Geoffrey Truchetti
Colombe Otis
Anne-Claire Brisville
Guy Beauchamp
Daniel Pang
Eric Troncy
spellingShingle Geoffrey Truchetti
Colombe Otis
Anne-Claire Brisville
Guy Beauchamp
Daniel Pang
Eric Troncy
Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Geoffrey Truchetti
Colombe Otis
Anne-Claire Brisville
Guy Beauchamp
Daniel Pang
Eric Troncy
author_sort Geoffrey Truchetti
title Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
title_short Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
title_full Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
title_fullStr Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
title_full_unstemmed Management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: A survey of current practice in Quebec.
title_sort management of veterinary anaesthesia in small animals: a survey of current practice in quebec.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description OBJECTIVE:To describe how small animal anaesthesia is performed in French-speaking Eastern Canada, and the variations between practices, in particular based on practice type, veterinarian gender and experience. DESIGN:Observational study, survey. SAMPLE:156 respondents. PROCEDURE:A questionnaire was designed to assess current small animal anaesthesia practices in French-speaking Eastern Canada, mainly in the province of Quebec. The questionnaire was available through SurveyMonkey, and consisted of four parts: demographic information about the veterinarians surveyed, evaluation and management of anaesthetic risk, anaesthesia procedure, monitoring and safety. Gender, year of graduation, and type of practice were tested as potential risk factors. Chi-square exact test was used to study relations between each risk factor, and the effect of the selected risk factor on each response of the survey. For ordinal data, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to maximize power. RESULTS:Response rate over a period of 3 months was 20.85% (156 respondents). Overall, the way anaesthesia is performed by most respondents does not meet international guidelines, such as patient preparation and evaluation prior to anaesthesia, not using individualised protocols (for 41%), not obtaining intravenous access (12.4% use it for all their anaesthesia in cats, and 30.6% in dogs), lack of patient monitoring at certain intervals for 55% of the responses, and client prompted optional analgesia (for 29% of respondents). Some practices are more compliant than others. Among them, referral centres generally offer better care than general practices. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:The level of care in anaesthesia and analgesia in practices in French-speaking Eastern Canada is concerning, highlighting the need for more sustained continuing education.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227204
work_keys_str_mv AT geoffreytruchetti managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
AT colombeotis managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
AT anneclairebrisville managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
AT guybeauchamp managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
AT danielpang managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
AT erictroncy managementofveterinaryanaesthesiainsmallanimalsasurveyofcurrentpracticeinquebec
_version_ 1714817068492128256